ruby-sig February 2021

ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org

5 participants
6 discussions

Ruby 2.2
by Vít Ondruch 25 Jan '22

25 Jan '22

Hi everybody, Since Ruby 2.2 is going to be released during Christmas and -preview1 release is imminent (this Wednesday?), it is probably time to start looking into its packaging. So here is the updated .spec file [1] and scratch build [2], which can be finally build on all platforms. Sorry, no Copr for you, since Ruby's build fails there due to old RHEL kernel :/. What has changed from packaging point of view? Luckily, not much, but here are a few bullets which comes to my mind: * RPM 4.12 introduces new %load function, which is used to load RPM macros during RPM build. This allowed to drop my custom RPM macro [3]. On the other hand, you'll be able to build the Ruby only on F21+ (luckily, you should be able to build SRPM everywhere). * The RubyGems filesystem was not explicit enough, so there might be something accidentally packages. This is now more explicit, so we should be safer. * Ruby now ships with MiniTest and Test::Unit. The very good news is that they are installed so far as a regular gems. This means that you have to always specify them in your Gemfile, if you are using Bundler, but this is generally step in good direction. I hope that upstream will not change their mind :) Due to this change, we have new subpackages rubygem-test-unit (and rubygem-power_assert, which is now Test::Unit's dependency). No more %{_bindir}/testrb (but nobody is using it these days anyway, right? ;) * Some prevailing test failures were resolved, some others introduced, but hopefully they'll get resolved prior stable release. Generally, I'd say that not much has changed since 2.1, which is good news. Please test the packaging if you can and let me know about any issues you encountered. Also, if you have any other suggestions about Ruby packaging in general, what we could improve etc, this is probably good time to share. It seems that OpenSUSE guys are improving their packaging, so you might want to get some inspiration there [4, 5, 6] ;) Vít [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ruby.git/log/?h=private-ruby-2.2 [2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7578843 [3] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ruby.git/commit/?h=private-ruby-2.2&id=8… [4] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:darix:ruby/ruby-common [5] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:darix:ruby/ruby2.2 [6] https://github.com/openSUSE/gem2rpm/commits/master

4 18

Self Introduction: Otto Urpelainen
by Otto Urpelainen 25 Feb '21

25 Feb '21

Hi all, Since I wrote a message to the Ruby SIG list, I suppose it is the time for self introduction. You can refer to my introduction on the devel list [1] for the basics. Regarding Ruby, I do not have any specific relationship with the language. I just happen to be a Jekyll user and ended up adopting the rubygem-jekyll package [2] together with related plugins and some dependencies. Since Jekyll is written in Ruby, I thought I should subscribe to this list, in order to track discussion possibly relevant for those packages. Regarding maintaining Ruby packages, I notice that some of the packages I maintain have the group @ruby-packagers-sig as co-maintainers, but not all. What is the set of packages this group wants to have access to? I could all them to all my packages, if the answer is "all Ruby packages". Regards, Otto [1]: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org… [2]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-jekyll/

3 4

How To Update Package Versions to Fix Failing Builds
by Addison Martin 24 Feb '21

24 Feb '21

Vit and Others, I was able to look at Koschei and get a sense of how it works by poking around and reading some documentation. I was not, however, able to figure out how to update packages to their latest versions? Is there a git I need to clone ( I found src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ but no way to clone)? Sorry for all the questions, and thanks for your time, Addison On February 8, 2021, ruby-sig-request(a)lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: > Send ruby-sig mailing list submissions to > ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or > body 'help' to > ruby-sig-request(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > ruby-sig-owner(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of ruby-sig digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Introduction (Vít Ondruch) > > > From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondruch(a)redhat.com> > Date: Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 9:41 AM > Subject: Re: Introduction > To: ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > Reply-To: Ruby SIG mailing list <ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> > > > Dear Addison, > > Hello and welcome! > > I think the best ways to start to contribute to Fedora Ruby community > could be: > > 1) Looking at Koschei [1] (our CI, trying to regularly rebuild Fedora > packages), it would be nice to help fix all the failing packages. > > 2) One of the easiest ways might be to try to update such packages to > their latest versions. However the caveat here is that the update > version can't broke the dependencies we already have. > > Please let us know should you have any questions. Trying to grasp all > the tools you need for the task might be a bit intimidating. > > > > Vít > > > > > > [1] > <https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/search?q=ruby%2A&order_by=state- > f34%2Crunning%2Cfailing%2Cname> > > Dne 07. 02. 21 v 22:53 Addison Martin napsal(a): > > Hello, > > > > My name is Addison Martin! I am a 23 year old Ruby programmer > > living in the United States. I would like to give back to my > > community and contribute to open source, also I'd love to learn more > > about the Fedora project. > > > > I have only contributed to an open source project once, so I am > > new. I would love for some help with where to get started > > contributing to Ruby on Fedora. > > > > Thanks, > > Addison > > > > _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing > > list -- ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:ruby- > > sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> To unsubscribe send an email to ruby- > > sig-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:ruby-sig- > > leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> Fedora Code of Conduct: > > <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/> List > > Guidelines: <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines> > > List Archives: <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby- > > sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> > > > > _______________________________________________ > ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en- > US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby- > sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org

3 2

net-http-persistent 4.0.1 hits rawhide/f34
by Mamoru TASAKA 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

Hello, ruby-sig folks: After a long delay, I've finally updated net-http-persistent to 4.0.1 on rawhide/f34, and also I've modified packages which directly depend on net-http-persistent: - rubygem-mechanize : actually not modified - rubygem-rubygems-mirror: code itself already supports net-http-persistent >= 3, modified gemspec dependency also fixed FTBFS, due to missing BR for webrick (for ruby 3.0 change) - rubygem-faraday applied upstream patch to support change on net-http-persistent >= 3 for error status when net connection fails I think I've done my best, however please try and check the above changes, thank you! Regards, Mamoru

2 1

Re: Orphaned my Ruby packages (Jekyll + dependencies)
by Mamoru TASAKA 14 Feb '21

14 Feb '21

Fabio Valentini wrote on 2021/02/14 4:29: > Hi everybody, > > With a heavy heart, I have orphaned all my Ruby packages today. > > - rubygem-kramdown-parser-gfm (kramdown support for GitHub-flavored markdown) > - rubygem-kramdown-syntax-coderay (coderay syntax highlighting support) > - rubygem-rouge (jekyll dep, default syntax highlighter, "compatible" > with pygments) > - rubygem-ruby-progressbar > - rubygem-stringex Taken these (rubygem-kramdown depends on 4 of these, rubygem-nokogiri depends on rubygem-ruby-progressbar). The packages I am maintaining is getting broader... > There are some known issues with the packages: > > - Some of them are failing to build on Fedora 34 due to changes in > Ruby 3.0 (jekyll, jekyll-feed, liquid, stringex, tomlrb). Actually rubygem-stringex test failure is not due to ruby 3.0, but change in RoR 6.1.x suite and I've fixed this. (I've not checked jekyll or so). > Big thanks to everybody who helped me with maintaining my Ruby > packages over the years. > Fabio Thank you for maintaining these packages till now. Regards, Mamoru

1 0

Introduction
by Addison Martin 08 Feb '21

08 Feb '21

Hello, My name is Addison Martin! I am a 23 year old Ruby programmer living in the United States. I would like to give back to my community and contribute to open source, also I'd love to learn more about the Fedora project. I have only contributed to an open source project once, so I am new. I would love for some help with where to get started contributing to Ruby on Fedora. Thanks, Addison

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

ruby-sig February 2021