ruby-sig May 2017

ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org

4 participants
8 discussions

Ruby 2.2
by Vít Ondruch 25 Jan '22

25 Jan '22

Hi everybody, Since Ruby 2.2 is going to be released during Christmas and -preview1 release is imminent (this Wednesday?), it is probably time to start looking into its packaging. So here is the updated .spec file [1] and scratch build [2], which can be finally build on all platforms. Sorry, no Copr for you, since Ruby's build fails there due to old RHEL kernel :/. What has changed from packaging point of view? Luckily, not much, but here are a few bullets which comes to my mind: * RPM 4.12 introduces new %load function, which is used to load RPM macros during RPM build. This allowed to drop my custom RPM macro [3]. On the other hand, you'll be able to build the Ruby only on F21+ (luckily, you should be able to build SRPM everywhere). * The RubyGems filesystem was not explicit enough, so there might be something accidentally packages. This is now more explicit, so we should be safer. * Ruby now ships with MiniTest and Test::Unit. The very good news is that they are installed so far as a regular gems. This means that you have to always specify them in your Gemfile, if you are using Bundler, but this is generally step in good direction. I hope that upstream will not change their mind :) Due to this change, we have new subpackages rubygem-test-unit (and rubygem-power_assert, which is now Test::Unit's dependency). No more %{_bindir}/testrb (but nobody is using it these days anyway, right? ;) * Some prevailing test failures were resolved, some others introduced, but hopefully they'll get resolved prior stable release. Generally, I'd say that not much has changed since 2.1, which is good news. Please test the packaging if you can and let me know about any issues you encountered. Also, if you have any other suggestions about Ruby packaging in general, what we could improve etc, this is probably good time to share. It seems that OpenSUSE guys are improving their packaging, so you might want to get some inspiration there [4, 5, 6] ;) Vít [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ruby.git/log/?h=private-ruby-2.2 [2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7578843 [3] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ruby.git/commit/?h=private-ruby-2.2&id=8… [4] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:darix:ruby/ruby-common [5] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:darix:ruby/ruby2.2 [6] https://github.com/openSUSE/gem2rpm/commits/master

4 18

Ruby 2.5
by Vít Ondruch 07 May '18

07 May '18

Hi all, Ruby 2.4 was released during Christmas and the upcoming Ruby 2.5 development is advancing, so I continue in the tradition and I got r58319 packaged for testing. The updated .spec file is available in dist-git private-ruby-2.5 branch and here is the scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18952639 One thing I'd like to point out that upstream is working on gemification of StdLib. The question ATM is what the result will be. Hence, there is one big TODO in the .spec file [1]. The question if each of the gems should be unbundled or not. The future will tell hopefully. Vít [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/ruby.git/tree/ruby.spec?h=private-r…

3 27

[ANN] ruby-sig and ruby-packagers-sig groups
by Vít Ondruch 13 Jul '17

13 Jul '17

Hi everybody, As I promised earlier [1], the ruby-sig and ruby-packagers-sig were established, together with ruby-packagers-sig mailing list [2]. Not sure precisely how this is going to pan out, but lets try this: 1) I would appreciate if we can transform the list of SIG members [3] into the ruby-sig FAS group. Therefore, can I ask interested parties to apply for this group in FAS? As soon as you apply, I will sponsor you and I'll select a few of you as additional sponsors. Not sure what should be the mininal level to sponsor members, but the bar shouldn't be high. May be introduction on ruby-sig ML together with ruby package review could suffice ... 2) Any of you who is maintaining some interesting package should think about (a) adding ruby-packagers-sig group as a administrator of the package (b) consider moving the ownership of the package to ruby-packages-sig (but please I hope it won't end up just as a junkyard of packages you don't have time to maintain anymore ;) ). As of membership in ruby-packagers-sig, I propose that the minimal level for sponsoring into this group should be maintenance of 5 ruby related package and be packager at least 1 year (possibly with some exception, especially for full time maintainers). Any thoughts, suggestions, comments? BTW, anybody willing to request badges for being member of Ruby-SIG? ;) Vít [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.… [2] https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/5478 [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Ruby#Members

3 14

Orphaning rubygem-ruby-ole
by Vít Ondruch 31 May '17

31 May '17

Hi all, I don't have any use for rubygem-ruby-ole, so I orphaned the package. Vít

1 0

Orphaning rubygem-configuration
by Vít Ondruch 31 May '17

31 May '17

Hi all, I have orphaned rubygem-configuration in F26+. This package was previously required by rubygem-launchy, but it is not needed anymore. Therefore I orphaned F26+, but keep the F2{4,5} till their EOL. Feel free to pick the package if you have any use for it or let it be garbage collected, since the upstream seems to be abandoned anyway. Vít

1 0

RFC: System wide change - Ruby on Rails 5.1
by Pavel Valena 22 May '17

22 May '17

Hello, please check Ruby on Rails 5.1 system wide change proposal. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_on_Rails_5.1 I will submit it to Wrangler on Thu May 25 in case there are no comments. Thanks! Pavel Valena Associate Software Engineer Brno, Czech Republic RED HAT | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. All of the airlines in the Fortune Global 500 rely on Red Hat. Find out why at Trusted | Red Hat <http://www.redhat.com/en/about/trusted>

3 3

rspec 3.6 hits rawhide, and probably F-26
by Mamoru TASAKA 10 May '17

10 May '17

Hello, ruby folks: I've updated rspec series to 3.6 on rawhide. I will probably update rspec to 3.6 also on F-26 because currently it is still before beta freeze and it still takes more than one month before F-26 is released. Regards, Mamoru

2 2

Request for review swap
by Mamoru TASAKA 05 May '17

05 May '17

Hello, ruby folks: I have one packages related to ruby gems needed for review: rubygem-webkit2-gtk - Ruby binding of WebKit2GTK+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448298 Review swap is welcome!! Regards, Mamoru

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

ruby-sig May 2017