Hi everybody,
I needed to check something in development version of Ruby today, so it was good opportunity to prepare updated package with the latest bits. I'll keep updating the sources in dist git private branch [1]. This should be the scratch build (if it succeeds):
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8810288
As always, let me know if you encounter any issues.
Vít
[1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ruby.git/log/?h=private-ruby-2.3
Hello Rubyists,
Another update, this time to r49705. Please find the changes in privare-ruby-2.3 branch in dist git and here is the scratch build for your testing:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9040761
Feedback is welcomed.
Vít
Hi All,
Another month passed and you might be interested in new development snapshot. So here it is:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9335347
This time it is r50092. The .spec file is in private-ruby-2.3 branch.
Please note that there were some concerns about empty ruby_version [1], so I modified the patch and ruby_version is not empty anymore. But that does not mean the issue is resolved. Hence I opened upstream ticket about this matter [2].
Let me know if anything is wrong.
Happy testing ;)
Vít
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923703 [2] https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11002
Dne 23.2.2015 v 17:41 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hello Rubyists,
Another update, this time to r49705. Please find the changes in privare-ruby-2.3 branch in dist git and here is the scratch build for your testing:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9040761
Feedback is welcomed.
Vít _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
Vit,
Please note that there were some concerns about empty ruby_version [1], so I modified the patch and ruby_version is not empty anymore. But that does not mean the issue is resolved. Hence I opened upstream ticket about this matter [2].
+1 for bringing back the ruby_version.
I see your point about the mess it can make, but if you don't use the configure argument, it's handled as one would expect. Right?
Fedora is the first place where I have seen where this autoconf option being used/set explicitly.
/allen
________________________________
Disclaimer Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, and any attachments and/or documents linked to this email, are intended for the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, proprietary, or otherwise protected by law. Any dissemination, distribution, or copying is prohibited. This notice serves as a confidentiality marking for the purpose of any confidentiality or nondisclosure agreement. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the original sender.
Yet another update:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9399395
This time, it is r50153. I modified further modified the ruby_version patches and submitted they upstream. Will see if they are accepted.
Vít
Dne 27.3.2015 v 10:13 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hi All,
Another month passed and you might be interested in new development snapshot. So here it is:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9335347
This time it is r50092. The .spec file is in private-ruby-2.3 branch.
Please note that there were some concerns about empty ruby_version [1], so I modified the patch and ruby_version is not empty anymore. But that does not mean the issue is resolved. Hence I opened upstream ticket about this matter [2].
Let me know if anything is wrong.
Happy testing ;)
Vít
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923703 [2] https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11002
Dne 23.2.2015 v 17:41 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hello Rubyists,
Another update, this time to r49705. Please find the changes in privare-ruby-2.3 branch in dist git and here is the scratch build for your testing:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9040761
Feedback is welcomed.
Vít _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
Hi Rubyists,
I updated yet again private-ruby-2.3 branch dist git and this time it is r50329. You can give a try to this scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9493028
Looking forward to your feedback.
Vít
Hi All,
I updated yet again private-ruby-2.3 branch dist git and this time it is r50427. You can give a try to this scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9657235
Looking forward to your feedback.
Vít
Hi all,
Another snapshot of Ruby is here, this time r50815. You can find the sources in private-ruby-2.3 branch of Ruby's dist-git or play with the scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10015356
Some notable changes includes:
* New (un)bundled net-telnet gem. This is now available as subpackage and I you have to install this package explicitly if you are using this functionality. * There were done some improvements in a way how the bundled gems are installed. This means that the .gemspec files of bundled gems are now valid out of the box and can be better integrated with Bundler.
Please let me know about any possible issues you encounter during your testing.
Vít
Hi everybody,
Here is another snapshot of Ruby 2.3:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10460738
This time it is r51358. You can find the .spec file in dist-git in private-ruby-2.3 branch.
One noteworthy change is included RubyGems 2.5, which ships with new resolver. Unfortunately, this resolver is bundled Molinillo. I tried to convince upstream, that this is not the best idea [1], but unfortunately I was not successful. So we should probably discuss with FPC, since the same happened to Bundler recently (and that is actually the reason, why we don't have the most recent version of Bundler in Fedora).
Vít
Hi all,
Here is yet another development snapshot of Ruby 2.3, this time r51643:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10756026
Last time I mentioned bundled Molinillo in RubyGems. I moved forward with this and asked FPC for exception:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/560
Please give it try and let me know if anything goes wrong.
Vít
Hi all,
Here is yet another snapshot release of Ruby 2.3, this time r51741:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10939306
This time it looks to be pretty boring update, but let me know if you note something worth of attention.
BTW last time I mentioned I asked exception for bundling Molinillo in Rubgems [1], which was approved. On contrary, I was suggested to drop rubygem-bundler from Fedora. I don't think this is good idea ....
Vít
Hi there,
And here is another development version of Ruby:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11093674
This time, it is r51856. You can find the .spec file in dist-git in private-ruby-2.3 branch.
One notable change is introduction of did_you_mean gem [1], which should give you better hint if you misspell some method name. This gem is shipped in rubygem-did_you_mean subpackage. Actually, thinking about it, it is not installed by default, so now I wonder when/where it will crash, probably something to investigate. Also note that since I am lazy, the NVR of did_you_mean contains the .beta2 string, which means that it won't be upgraded to 1.0.0 release when time comes, but this is just test release, so you can handle that ;)
Please let me know about any issues you might discover.
Vít
Dne 16.9.2015 v 09:44 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Actually, thinking about it, it is not installed by default, so now I wonder when/where it will crash, probably something to investigate.
Found it, it is optionally loaded in gem_prelude.rb [1]. So what dependency should I use? Recommends or Suggests? I'll go probably with Recommends, so it is installed by default to keep the user experience, but you can remove it in case you wish to minimize the install size. Thoughts?
Vít
[1] https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/40f304e025dbaeb954e2c324836ab4cf23f12053
+1 on recommends.
Josef
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Vít Ondruch vondruch@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 16.9.2015 v 09:44 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Actually, thinking about it, it is not installed by default, so now I wonder when/where it will crash, probably something to investigate.
Found it, it is optionally loaded in gem_prelude.rb [1]. So what dependency should I use? Recommends or Suggests? I'll go probably with Recommends, so it is installed by default to keep the user experience, but you can remove it in case you wish to minimize the install size. Thoughts?
Vít
[1] https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/40f304e025dbaeb954e2c324836ab4cf23f12053 _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
Hi all,
So here is yet another development snapshot, this time r52191:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11498397
Sources are available in private-ruby-2.3 branch of Ruby dist-git as always.
Notable changes from packaging point of view are:
1) Weak dependencies are used where possible [1]. This means that using DNF, you don't have to install rubygems if you don't need them. Or you don't have to install rubygem-rdoc if you don't want to genereate RDoc documentation. But of course they are installed by default. So the user experience should be the same.
2) The %gem_install macro now uses the fixed --build-root parameter, as I previously mentioned in [2].
Please let me know if you'll find any issues with this release.
Thx
Vít
[1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ruby.git/commit/?h=private-ruby-2.3&i... [2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/2015-September/001812.htm...
Hi all,
Here is another test build of Ruby 2.3, this time r52392:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11640109
Let me know if you notice some issues.
Vít
Hi,
Since we are nearing to stable release of Ruby 2.3, upstream release first Ruby 2.3 preview1 snapshot. Here is the release announcement:
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/71450
and here you can grab the package for testing:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11805569
As always, let me know if you encounter any issues with the package.
Vít
I briefly tested the builds together with the new changes like did_you_mean? gem and frozen strings features.
Seems to be working.
Best Josef
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Vít Ondruch vondruch@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
Since we are nearing to stable release of Ruby 2.3, upstream release first Ruby 2.3 preview1 snapshot. Here is the release announcement:
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/71450
and here you can grab the package for testing:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11805569
As always, let me know if you encounter any issues with the package.
Vít _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
Hi everybody,
Here is yet another test release of upcoming Ruby 2.3, this time r52759:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11993896
Please test the package and let me know if you encounter any issues.
Vít
Hi everybody,
You probably noticed that new preview release of Ruby was released [1]. Therefore I updated the .spec file in private-ruby-2.3 dist-git branch and here is the build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12195641
ARM build have not succeeded, but I am not going for another attempt, since it is quite hard to make successful Ruby build these days due to bug in glibc [2].
Among other things interesting in this release, I'd like highlight this new feature:
RubyVM::InstructionSequence#to_binary and .load_from_binary are introduced as experimental features. With these features, we can make an ISeq (bytecode) pre-compilation system.
And as always, please let me know if you encounter any issues.
Thanks,
Vít
[1] https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2015/12/11/ruby-2-3-0-preview2-released/ [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281714
Hi all,
Here is the latest development version of Ruby 2.3, r53264 this time:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12294564
Since the official release of Ruby 2.3 should be coming out at 25th of December, i.e. in two days, I hope this is the last test build for this development cycle. So if you can, please test the build and let me know if there is some issue.
I hope that right after Christmas, we will be able to proceed with Ruby 2.3 for F24+ and with subsequent rebuild of ruby packages with binary extensions.
Best,
Vít
ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Allen Hewes -
Josef Stribny -
Vít Ondruch