Hi rubyists,
Today, we proposed new features for F19:
Ruby 2.0.0: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ruby_2.0.0 JRuby 1.7: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/JRuby_1.7
These will be accompanied by small changes to packaging guidelines [1] if approved by FPC [2].
Note, that we are still planning to introduce rubypick [3] (formerly know as multiruby), to ease selection of alternative Ruby implementations.
Any feedback welcomed. Thanks.
Vít
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Ruby [2] https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/242 [3] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick
need times to familiar. thanks.
2013/1/16 Vít Ondruch vondruch@redhat.com
Hi rubyists,
Today, we proposed new features for F19:
Ruby 2.0.0: https://fedoraproject.org/**wiki/Features/Ruby_2.0.0https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ruby_2.0.0 JRuby 1.7: https://fedoraproject.org/**wiki/Features/JRuby_1.7https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/JRuby_1.7
These will be accompanied by small changes to packaging guidelines [1] if approved by FPC [2].
Note, that we are still planning to introduce rubypick [3] (formerly know as multiruby), to ease selection of alternative Ruby implementations.
Any feedback welcomed. Thanks.
Vít
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/**wiki/PackagingDrafts/Rubyhttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Ruby [2] https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/**ticket/242https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/242 [3] https://github.com/bkabrda/**rubypickhttps://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick
______________________________**_________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.**org ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sighttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
----- Original Message -----
Hi rubyists,
Today, we proposed new features for F19:
Ruby 2.0.0: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ruby_2.0.0 JRuby 1.7: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/JRuby_1.7
These will be accompanied by small changes to packaging guidelines [1] if approved by FPC [2].
Note, that we are still planning to introduce rubypick [3] (formerly know as multiruby), to ease selection of alternative Ruby implementations.
Any feedback welcomed. Thanks.
Vít
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Ruby [2] https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/242 [3] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick
Just FYI, I have implemented choosing runtime into rubypick by using env variable. You will be able to use one of these: RUBYPICK=_mri_ ruby # runs MRI interpreter RUBYPICK=_jruby_ gem # runs gem in jruby Of course you can also "export RUBYPICK=_jruby_" and just work with JRuby.
Hi，Bohuslav Kabrda
I am a ruby developer, your script is just like RVM .this is good tool.
2013/1/22 Bohuslav Kabrda bkabrda@redhat.com
----- Original Message -----
Hi rubyists,
Today, we proposed new features for F19:
Ruby 2.0.0: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ruby_2.0.0 JRuby 1.7: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/JRuby_1.7
These will be accompanied by small changes to packaging guidelines [1] if approved by FPC [2].
Note, that we are still planning to introduce rubypick [3] (formerly know as multiruby), to ease selection of alternative Ruby implementations.
Any feedback welcomed. Thanks.
Vít
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Ruby [2] https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/242 [3] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick
Just FYI, I have implemented choosing runtime into rubypick by using env variable. You will be able to use one of these: RUBYPICK=_mri_ ruby # runs MRI interpreter RUBYPICK=_jruby_ gem # runs gem in jruby Of course you can also "export RUBYPICK=_jruby_" and just work with JRuby.
-- Regards, Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda. _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
Hello:
Vít Ondruch wrote, at 01/16/2013 09:38 PM +9:00:
Hi rubyists,
Today, we proposed new features for F19:
Ruby 2.0.0: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ruby_2.0.0 JRuby 1.7: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/JRuby_1.7
These will be accompanied by small changes to packaging guidelines [1] if approved by FPC [2]. Note, that we are still planning to introduce rubypick [3] (formerly know as multiruby), to ease selection of alternative Ruby implementations.
Any feedback welcomed. Thanks.
Vít
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Ruby [2] https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/242 [3] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick
First of all I appreciate your work on ruby 2.0.
For ruby.spec on ruby-2.0 branch, at least please fix the Version of rubygems and ruby-rdoc. rpm's Version must not contain "preview" or so.
Regards, Mamoru
Dne 23.1.2013 15:05, Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hello:
Vít Ondruch wrote, at 01/16/2013 09:38 PM +9:00:
Hi rubyists,
Today, we proposed new features for F19:
Ruby 2.0.0: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ruby_2.0.0 JRuby 1.7: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/JRuby_1.7
These will be accompanied by small changes to packaging guidelines [1] if approved by FPC [2]. Note, that we are still planning to introduce rubypick [3] (formerly know as multiruby), to ease selection of alternative Ruby implementations.
Any feedback welcomed. Thanks.
Vít
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Ruby [2] https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/242 [3] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick
First of all I appreciate your work on ruby 2.0.
For ruby.spec on ruby-2.0 branch, at least please fix the Version of rubygems and ruby-rdoc. rpm's Version must not contain "preview" or so.
Than you for letting me know. You are right. I'll try to fix it, although I am not sure it will not be too big hassle for rubygem-rdoc, due to macros spread all around the spec file. Moreover I hope upstream will drop the "preview" prior release.
Vít
Regards, Mamoru
ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Bohuslav Kabrda -
Mamoru TASAKA -
tommy xiao -
Vít Ondruch