There is a pretty severe bug that's probably a good candidate for backport to F20 and rawhide. The patch [1] reduces a potential deadlock with using Process.daemon. I can commit the patch and build a new version for the affected versions, just want to make sure people are on-board with pushing this into our packages until 2.1 final is released.
-Sam
1. https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-trunk/repository/revisions/41910/di...
Dne 21.11.2013 00:08, Sam Kottler napsal(a):
There is a pretty severe bug that's probably a good candidate for backport to F20 and rawhide. The patch [1] reduces a potential deadlock with using Process.daemon. I can commit the patch and build a new version for the affected versions, just want to make sure people are on-board with pushing this into our packages until 2.1 final is released.
-Sam
ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
Hi Sam,
What is the original upstream issue? Is it backported to Ruby 2.0.0 already?
Vít
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vít Ondruch" vondruch@redhat.com To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:43:32 AM Subject: Re: Process.daemon deadlock bug
Dne 21.11.2013 00:08, Sam Kottler napsal(a):
There is a pretty severe bug that's probably a good candidate for backport to F20 and rawhide. The patch [1] reduces a potential deadlock with using Process.daemon. I can commit the patch and build a new version for the affected versions, just want to make sure people are on-board with pushing this into our packages until 2.1 final is released.
-Sam
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-trunk/repository/revisions/41910/di... _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
Hi Sam,
What is the original upstream issue? Is it backported to Ruby 2.0.0 already?
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8616
It is backported to 2.0 - http://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?revision=43142&view=revision. You can reproduce it really simply:
<code> #!/usr/bin/env ruby Thread.new { sleep } Process.daemon </code>
When that daemon is supposed to exit, it will actually require being `kill -9`'ed.
Vít _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
Dne 22.11.2013 20:37, Sam Kottler napsal(a):
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vít Ondruch" vondruch@redhat.com To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:43:32 AM Subject: Re: Process.daemon deadlock bug
Dne 21.11.2013 00:08, Sam Kottler napsal(a):
There is a pretty severe bug that's probably a good candidate for backport to F20 and rawhide. The patch [1] reduces a potential deadlock with using Process.daemon. I can commit the patch and build a new version for the affected versions, just want to make sure people are on-board with pushing this into our packages until 2.1 final is released.
-Sam
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-trunk/repository/revisions/41910/di... _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
Hi Sam,
What is the original upstream issue? Is it backported to Ruby 2.0.0 already?
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8616
It is backported to 2.0 - http://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?revision=43142&view=revision.
Ok, thanks. Since new version of Ruby was released at Friday, they will fix also this issue. Somebody should do rebase in all branches.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033546
Vít
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vít Ondruch" vondruch@redhat.com To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2013 4:05:28 AM Subject: Re: Process.daemon deadlock bug
Dne 22.11.2013 20:37, Sam Kottler napsal(a):
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vít Ondruch" vondruch@redhat.com To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:43:32 AM Subject: Re: Process.daemon deadlock bug
Dne 21.11.2013 00:08, Sam Kottler napsal(a):
There is a pretty severe bug that's probably a good candidate for backport to F20 and rawhide. The patch [1] reduces a potential deadlock with using Process.daemon. I can commit the patch and build a new version for the affected versions, just want to make sure people are on-board with pushing this into our packages until 2.1 final is released.
-Sam
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-trunk/repository/revisions/41910/di... _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
Hi Sam,
What is the original upstream issue? Is it backported to Ruby 2.0.0 already?
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8616
It is backported to 2.0 - http://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?revision=43142&view=revision.
Ok, thanks. Since new version of Ruby was released at Friday, they will fix also this issue. Somebody should do rebase in all branches.
Yeah, we need to bump the version to fix the latest CVE. Do you want to work on that or should I start on it?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033546
Vít
ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
Dne 25.11.2013 03:15, Sam Kottler napsal(a):
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vít Ondruch" vondruch@redhat.com To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2013 4:05:28 AM Subject: Re: Process.daemon deadlock bug
Dne 22.11.2013 20:37, Sam Kottler napsal(a):
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vít Ondruch" vondruch@redhat.com To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:43:32 AM Subject: Re: Process.daemon deadlock bug
Dne 21.11.2013 00:08, Sam Kottler napsal(a):
There is a pretty severe bug that's probably a good candidate for backport to F20 and rawhide. The patch [1] reduces a potential deadlock with using Process.daemon. I can commit the patch and build a new version for the affected versions, just want to make sure people are on-board with pushing this into our packages until 2.1 final is released.
-Sam
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-trunk/repository/revisions/41910/di... _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
Hi Sam,
What is the original upstream issue? Is it backported to Ruby 2.0.0 already?
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8616
It is backported to 2.0 - http://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?revision=43142&view=revision.
Ok, thanks. Since new version of Ruby was released at Friday, they will fix also this issue. Somebody should do rebase in all branches.
Yeah, we need to bump the version to fix the latest CVE. Do you want to work on that or should I start on it?
Mamoru already started and I continue.
Vít
ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Sam Kottler -
Vít Ondruch