Hello,
I have recently pushed my ongoing work on packaging Ruby 1.9.3 for F17 to my github [1]. Pleas don't hesitate and contact me if you have any comments. Pull requests are welcomed.
Vit
Vit,
Does that mean 1.9 RPMs will not be available for F16?
Thanks,
Phil.
On 2011-09-22 16:46, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hello,
I have recently pushed my ongoing work on packaging Ruby 1.9.3 for F17 to my github [1]. Pleas don't hesitate and contact me if you have any comments. Pull requests are welcomed.
Vit
[1] https://github.com/voxik/ruby.spec _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
Yes. I do not plan to backport anything. Its going to be complex change anyway.
Vit
Dne 22.9.2011 08:50, Philip Rhoades napsal(a):
Vit,
Does that mean 1.9 RPMs will not be available for F16?
Thanks,
Phil.
On 2011-09-22 16:46, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hello,
I have recently pushed my ongoing work on packaging Ruby 1.9.3 for F17 to my github [1]. Pleas don't hesitate and contact me if you have any comments. Pull requests are welcomed.
Vit
[1] https://github.com/voxik/ruby.spec _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
Vít,
OK, no worries - thanks for your efforts anyway.
Regards,
Phil.
On 2011-09-22 19:34, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Yes. I do not plan to backport anything. Its going to be complex change anyway.
Vit
Dne 22.9.2011 08:50, Philip Rhoades napsal(a):
Vit,
Does that mean 1.9 RPMs will not be available for F16?
Thanks,
Phil.
On 2011-09-22 16:46, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hello,
I have recently pushed my ongoing work on packaging Ruby 1.9.3 for F17 to my github [1]. Pleas don't hesitate and contact me if you have any comments. Pull requests are welcomed.
Vit
[1] https://github.com/voxik/ruby.spec _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hello,
I have recently pushed my ongoing work on packaging Ruby 1.9.3 for F17 to my github [1]. Pleas don't hesitate and contact me if you have any comments. Pull requests are welcomed.
Vit and myself have discussed the topic of pushing Ruby 1.9.3 in F-17, and for my interest is currently limited to Puppet continuing to work, we have decided Vit pushes out his Ruby 1.9.3 builds to a Fedora People repository, so that I can test - and obviously you can as well. We may even request a ruby-193 rawhide koji build tag/target for this with Release Engineering - or in other words, Dennis Gilmore.
The remainder of things to do with regards to Ruby 1.9.3 in F-17, if all builds and tests are successful, was considered to be -and Vit, please correct me if I'm wrong;
- Rebuild all other packages dependent on Ruby against
"Requires: ruby(abi) = %{ruby_abi}"
The ruby_abi macro would (initially) be provided by the ruby package in /etc/rpm/macros.ruby, set to the Major.Minor release of the Ruby version the ruby package carries,
- Update the packaging guidelines to mandate the use of "Requires: ruby(abi) = %{ruby_abi}" - this greatly enhances our abilities to rebuild stacks for different versions of Ruby.
Aside from that, we have looked over the .spec file for Ruby 1.9.3 - based on my .spec originally for 1.9.1, IIRC, and have decided that the use of /usr/{lib{,64},share}/ruby and /usr/local/{lib{,64},share}/ruby was the best approach.
We've also (shortly) deliberated on the other topics in the agenda Vit had sent out, but I'm going to let Vit report on those. I think the path to Ruby 1.9.3 is a topic in itself and can be / has to be pursued regardless of the outcome of other topics.
I would like to propose, however, that in preparation of FUDCon in Blacksburg, which I'll be attending, Vit and myself -and others interested and able physically or digitally- get together in Brno for a couple of days (we would call this a FAD), to fully flesh out any of the remaining details in terms of processes (like packaging guidelines), potential problems, and further ideas.
ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Jeroen van Meeuwen -
Philip Rhoades -
Vít Ondruch