On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 10:19:15 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 11:24 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
- Look on the fedora-packaging list for the discussion
- my guess is:
a. if the fedora.us package had a non-zero epoch it needs to be maintained - just so users have an upgrade path b. if the fedora.us package had an Epoch: 0 drop it and remove %{epoch} from anyplace you have it in ver strings.
I agree with this. Anyone else have thoughts?
Dropping "Epoch: 0" breaks rpm -F updates. This is in bugzilla somewhere.