On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 15:09 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"JW" == Jarod Wilson jwilson@redhat.com writes:
JW> I'd like to package up Maia Mailguard, and the license appears to JW> be original BSD (advertising clause included) with a branding JW> extension added. Thoughts?
In a way it's sort of like the GFDL with its invariant section. I personally think that kind of thing renders the software "non-free", but I'm not a lawyer.
Not sure if that license is free, to me it stinks, but in any case the GFDL is a Documentation License, not a Software License, let's keep apples to apples comparisons, and let's try to not get infected by the Debian disease about defining what is software.
Simo.