On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Sérgio Basto sergio@serjux.com wrote:
On Seg, 2016-03-14 at 08:54 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/13/2016 08:12 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 9:15 PM, David Timms dtimms@iinet.net.au wrote:
Hi, I've worked out what seemed to be a correct URL for for rakarrack spec, now that it is accessed via git within the sf website:
I couldn't work out how to fit the sourceforce git URLs from: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.ne t or https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Git_Hosting_Se rvices
to suit. Any ideas for a standard way to handle sf git snapshots ?
Move them to github. Seriously. Sourceforge has been playing various games to avoid accessing content without going through their adveritising functions since they were first founded, and I've found no reason to work with any project hosted there since..... checking old notes, not since 2009.
Devshare (I think it is called devshare) was a mistake and only happens on windows, and all the fault can't be impute to sf.net. sf.net was and still is an important organization that support open source and free software .
I didn't mention Devshare. I referred to the confusing and difficult to predict mishmosh of redirects, used to force developers like myself to click thorugh at least one page of undesired graphical advertisement to get a working URL for the actual source code.