On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 1:18 PM Neal Gompa ngompa13@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 1:00 PM Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com wrote:
On 16. 12. 19 16:56, Neal Gompa wrote:
For what it's worth. I think %pycached is a nice improvement. I'm not sure if I like the name of it specifically, but the behavior is quite desirable.
Naming things ¯_(ツ)_/¯
I was thinking:
%with_pycache - collides with bconds %include_pycache - quite long %pyc - quite indecipherable %pycache - might be mistaken to only include the pyc files
%pycached doesn't sound that bad to me - include that file, but also its cached Python bytecode. However I am not a native speaker and I realize I often desecrate the English language. Got any better suggestions?
%pyfile is probably quite enough for that. It looks and feels like a marker instead of something strange, and the underlying behavior is somewhat immaterial.
I support this incremental improvement.
I agree with Neal here. %pyfile is probably the best/simplest option. It will read best too, as it basically says "Deploy the functionality of this python file in the appropriate manner". The implementation can then be adjusted as needed.