Hi,
Regarding this bug : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/204568
It does makes sense to ship the DirectFB static libraries for some users. So here are my questions : - Should they be put into the existing -devel sub-package? - Should they be put into a new separate sub-package? (-static)
I'm asking because since it's not really for "development", it would make sense to split it out in a new sub-package. Also, that way it would avoid any possible scenario where something rebuilding against DirectFB would "accidentally" link statically instead of dynamically.
Thoughts? Some existing guideline I might have missed?
Matthias