On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 5:12 AM Petr Viktorin pviktori@redhat.com wrote:
While "Deploy the functionality of this python file in the appropriate manner" would be great, it would need to guess too much. The filename doesn't have enough info. %pycached's very limited scope is a feature. It should be a reliable tool that you can use manually, or later as part of a more complex system.
As for the name, I hope y'all don't mind that we skipped the bikeshedding and went with %pycached after considering the alternatives privately.
Not a problem. I didn't note the date to the email I was replying to. (I am still processing through a ridiculous amount of email from my vacation). I'm good with how things turned out.