"AT" == Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm@ATrpms.net writes:
AT> Also since there is a distinction of GPL<=2 and GPL3, the LGPL AT> should also deserve its own license tag.
Of course it does; is there anything that doesn't use a tag of "LGPL" to indicate the LGPL?
Does your statement indicate that you think something should be changed about the draft? I haven't yet presented a list of licenses that should receive standardized tags.
- J<