Axel Thimm schrieb:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 02:32:57PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 11.05.2007 14:16, Enrico Scholz wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis fedora@leemhuis.info writes: Using wrappers like 'fedora-usermgmt' will make life of admins easier because they have to configure their system only once instead of updating their 'setup' package regularly.
Well, 'fedora-usermgmt' is a masterpiece of marketing: Promising the best of static and dynamic uid/gid and delivering the worst ;)
You should be aware that some people think different about fedora-usermgmt. Especially as Enrico is the creator of fedora-usermgmt. So please be a bit more diplomatic and avoid such flamebits, as that might help to avoid yet another flamewar.
Maybe. But it seems it made lots of people really unhappy, so something is wrong somewhere.
The I wonder why you voted for keeping it.
In EPEL? I didn't want rules for packaging to be different between Fedora and EPEL.
CU thl