Panu Matilainen wrote:
A name is just a name, there's no functional difference. Once upon a time in a faraway galaxy there might have been, but that's nothing you need to worry about. These days its just a naming convention, albeit a rather blurry one.
The bottom line: as long as your macros are "namespaced" (such as your GNAT/_GNAT prefix) to limit the possibility of clashes with others, you're technically free to call them whatever you want. Following existing conventions is not a bad idea though.
OK, one problem less to worry about. Thanks!
Björn Persson