On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 05:51:31PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
As promised, here is my new proposed draft for handling static libs:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/StaticLibraryPolicy
I know that it won't make everyone happy (it doesn't just leave static bits in -devel), but we really do want to track who is building against static libraries.
Can you remove the perjorative term "deficiency", since OCaml has good reasons for statically linking to do with software safety.
Rich.