I've got a gem (rubygem-virtus) that uses rspec/its in its test suite. Is it worth packaging rubygem-rspec-its? Or is there a replacement that virtus upstream ought to be using?
- Ken
As far as I understand, its should not be used at all:
https://gist.github.com/myronmarston/4503509
But not everybody is probably convinced, so if it is maintained upstream and you are willing to maintain it, then I see no problem to introduce this package into Fedora.
Vít
Dne 24.10.2014 v 22:17 Ken Dreyer napsal(a):
I've got a gem (rubygem-virtus) that uses rspec/its in its test suite. Is it worth packaging rubygem-rspec-its? Or is there a replacement that virtus upstream ought to be using?
- Ken
ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
Dne 27.10.2014 v 09:23 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
As far as I understand, its should not be used at all:
"its syntax" should read better :)
Vít
https://gist.github.com/myronmarston/4503509
But not everybody is probably convinced, so if it is maintained upstream and you are willing to maintain it, then I see no problem to introduce this package into Fedora.
Vít
Dne 24.10.2014 v 22:17 Ken Dreyer napsal(a):
I've got a gem (rubygem-virtus) that uses rspec/its in its test suite. Is it worth packaging rubygem-rspec-its? Or is there a replacement that virtus upstream ought to be using?
- Ken
ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Vít Ondruch vondruch@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 27.10.2014 v 09:23 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
As far as I understand, its should not be used at all:
"its syntax" should read better :)
Vít
https://gist.github.com/myronmarston/4503509
But not everybody is probably convinced, so if it is maintained upstream and you are willing to maintain it, then I see no problem to introduce this package into Fedora.
Thanks for pointing me at that link. I've filed an issue with a gem upstream that uses it. I hope more upstream gem developers can read it.
In the meantime I've opened a review request for rubygem-rspec-its: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1168743
- Ken
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Ken Dreyer ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Vít Ondruch vondruch@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 27.10.2014 v 09:23 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
As far as I understand, its should not be used at all:
"its syntax" should read better :)
Vít
https://gist.github.com/myronmarston/4503509
But not everybody is probably convinced, so if it is maintained upstream and you are willing to maintain it, then I see no problem to introduce this package into Fedora.
Thanks for pointing me at that link. I've filed an issue with a gem upstream that uses it. I hope more upstream gem developers can read it.
In the meantime I've opened a review request for rubygem-rspec-its: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1168743
Thanks to mtasaka for doing the review. rubygem-rspec-its is now available in Rawhide.
I had a couple of gems (rubygem-virtus, rubygem-acts-as-taggable-on) that required this, and there may be more out there. If you run into test suite failures in Rawhide with rspec 3, try BuildRequire'ing this gem! :)
- Ken
ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org