council February 2016

council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org

14 participants
20 discussions

[council] #40: Enforcing the code of conduct
by fedora-badges 10 Nov '16

10 Nov '16

#40: Enforcing the code of conduct -------------------+--------------------------------- Reporter: duffy | Owner: Status: new | Priority: normal Component: Legal | Keywords: coc, code of conduct -------------------+--------------------------------- See this post from the outreach-list regarding the actual enforcement of the code of conduct as currently written: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/outreach/2015-July/000067.html Langdon asked that this be made a ticket for council discussion, with the concern that an unenforceable / consequence without an SOP is a threat and isn't the right way to go: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/outreach/2015-August/000073.html For reference, the actual text is: "FUDCon brings together contributors and users from all over the world and this diversity is one of our greatest strengths. This diversity however can also lead to communication issues and unhappiness. Attendees are required to be considerate and respectful of each other. This includes, but is not limited to: - "Refraining from rude behaviour - "Refraining from any sort of harassment or discrimination (based on ethnic background, religion, gender, sexuality, body shape, disability, geographic location, sports team, preferred operating system or anything else) - "Obeying local laws "Attendees who are in violation of this policy may be subject to removal and banning from FUDCon (and future Fedora events). Whether an attendee is in violation is at the sole discretion of the conference organizers. Anyone with a possible concern relating to the code of conduct is encouraged to either email Rupali Talwatkar or talk directly to one of the designated FUDCon volunteers. Designated FUDCon volunteers will have a dark blue coloured VOLUNTEER badge." The line of particular concern here is: "Attendees who are in violation of this policy may be subject to removal and banning from FUDCon (and future Fedora events)." -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/40> council <https://fedorahosted.org/council> Fedora Council Public Tickets

2 15

[council] #43: Create the Fedora Public Budget Page
by fedora-badges 07 Nov '16

07 Nov '16

#43: Create the Fedora Public Budget Page -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: decause | Owner: decause Status: new | Priority: normal Component: General | Keywords: budget, websites, FCL, transparency, | community -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- As per the results of our council discussion here (https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/council- discuss/2015-October/013742.html) we are heretofore establishing a new page (wiki or otherwise) that will track the timeline and particulars of the Fedora Public Budget. It shall include: Budgetary Components, Projected and Adjusted for each fiscal year: - Regional Budget Allocations (APAC/EMEA/LATAM/NA) - Fedora Premier Event Budgets (FLOCK, FUDCon) - Central Discretionary Fund (approved by Council) - FAD specific Budgets Budgetary Milestones and Timelines: - August: In person meeting at FLOCK - September: Proposed budget components and metrics from each region - October: Ratification of Proposed Budget by Council - March: Confirmation of Received budget w/ Adjustment Meeting - Quarterly Check-ins with Regional Treasurers - Halfly approvals of Regional Funds, pending metrics and outcomes reporting If there are other details or resources that should be included on this page, feel free to leave them in the comments below. I would propose that this page eventually be made available at http://budget.fedoraproject.org -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/43> council <https://fedorahosted.org/council> Fedora Council Public Tickets

1 14

[council] #16: Periodic contributor survey
by fedora-badges 07 Nov '16

07 Nov '16

#16: Periodic contributor survey ---------------------+------------------- Reporter: mattdm | Owner: Status: new | Priority: normal Component: General | Keywords: ---------------------+------------------- This is a tracking ticket for establishing a process by which we get regular feedback from the Fedora contributor base. This is a companion to https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/1. The desired goals, methodology, and basically everything else are really different between users and contributors it will be better to track them separately. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/16> council <https://fedorahosted.org/council> Fedora Project Board Public Tickets

1 3

[council] #42: Schedule a FLOCK Budget Planning Session w/Council
by fedora-badges 24 Aug '16

24 Aug '16

#42: Schedule a FLOCK Budget Planning Session w/Council -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: decause | Owner: decause Status: new | Priority: minor Component: Board Meta | Keywords: FLOCK, session, budget, council, | fiscal, -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- As per our discussion about Budget Planning here, (https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/council- discuss/2015-October/013742.html) one conclusion we came to was that Budget Planning for the next fiscal year would begin during August at FLOCK with a high-bandwidth in person meeting, that continued on maillists and IRC through September, and was delivered to the FCL in October, to be presented to Red Hat via OSAS. This ticket is a reminder that we need to schedule a session at FLOCK for the high-bandwidth in person session. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/42> council <https://fedorahosted.org/council> Fedora Council Public Tickets

1 2

[council] #50: Schedule a Flock Council Update & Town Hall for Krakow 2016
by fedora-badges 24 Aug '16

24 Aug '16

#50: Schedule a Flock Council Update & Town Hall for Krakow 2016 -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: decause | Owner: decause Status: new | Priority: normal Component: Board Meta | Keywords: Flock, Flock 2016, Council Update, | council -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- This the is the traditional Flock session where members of the council meet with community members and update folks on the status of Objectives, as well as discuss issues and ideas for the future. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/50> council <https://fedorahosted.org/council> Fedora Council Public Tickets

1 2

[council] #49: Decision FUDCon APAC 2016
by fedora-badges 20 Jun '16

20 Jun '16

#49: Decision FUDCon APAC 2016 ---------------------+------------------- Reporter: gnokii | Owner: Status: new | Priority: normal Component: General | Keywords: ---------------------+------------------- following a conversation with Matthew I write this ticket: The rules for choose a place to holding FUDCons says, that FAmSCo and Board or now Council have to agree to the recommendation the local Ambassadors do. Until yet I only saw more questions which are answered and following that a discussion, if we should keep FUDCon. Please, keep in mind how that might look to the bidders, its already the second time the cambodian community did a bid, when instead of a decision a discussion comes up to wipe it out. It might look to this community that we not want it there and we dont want cambodians in our community. We already lost 2 months where a clear statement would have the local community enabled to work on making a successful FUDCon 2016. It is legitimate to discuss if FUDCon is still needed in the regions but have an eye that the bid means there putting people work and effort into it, especially in this case as there was a lot of requirements the indian community wanted to see before agree to the bid. So please go on and make a decision, to give the local community a chance to work on it. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Bid_for_PhnomPenh_2016 -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/49> council <https://fedorahosted.org/council> Fedora Council Public Tickets

1 6

[council] #51: Decision for FUDCon LATAM 2016
by fedora-badges 29 Apr '16

29 Apr '16

#51: Decision for FUDCon LATAM 2016 ---------------------+------------------- Reporter: potty | Owner: Status: new | Priority: normal Component: General | Keywords: fudcon ---------------------+------------------- Hello Council! LATAM Ambassadors and collaborators decided to chose Puno, Peru as the place to host FUDCon LATAM 2016 (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Puno_2016). Here are the meeting logs of the voting: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora- meeting-2/2016-02-06/fedora_latam_ambassadors_meeting.2016-02-06-22.53.html We need your blessing to make this a reality. Kindly regards! -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/51> council <https://fedorahosted.org/council> Fedora Council Public Tickets

1 6

[council] #38: Dopr
by fedora-badges 21 Mar '16

21 Mar '16

#38: Dopr ------------------------+------------------- Reporter: msuchy | Owner: Status: new | Priority: normal Component: Trademarks | Keywords: ------------------------+------------------- Hi, we (as Copr team) would like to introduce new service "DOPR". It is very easy. It combine user Dockerfile and user's Copr and create new docker image on DockerHub. You can see staging instance at: http://dopr-dev.cloud.fedoraproject.org/ We would like to start production instance. However some members of fedora-infra would like to see this go through Council first. There is some sense on this as this is kind of new way of distribution of Fedora (beside Spins, Remixs...). It creates all docker images directly on DockerHub so technically speaking they are not created in Fedora infrastructure, but they are created under Fedora account. And we would like to market it as "Fedorea + Copr" or similar. So my question: Does Fedora Council approve granting trademark usage on resulting docker images? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/38> council <https://fedorahosted.org/council> Fedora Council Public Tickets

1 30

proposed meeting schedule for upcoming months
by Matthew Miller 16 Mar '16

16 Mar '16

I'm assuming Monday at the same timeslot. Feb 22 -- Tickets and Ongoing Feb 29 -- Open Floor (and Leap Day!) Mar 7 -- Subproject Report (TBD) Mar 14 -- Review of Council Objectives (University, Modularization) Mar 21 -- Tickets and Ongoing Mar 28 -- Open Floor Apr 4 -- Subproject Report (TBD) Apr 11 -- Open Floor Apr 18 -- Tickets and Ongoing Apr 25 -- Open Floor May 2 -- Subproject Report (TBD) (and probably on in an similar manner from there) Note that March 14 is right after the US switch to Daylight Saving Time. Should we move our meeting with it? But, since the composition of the council changes, it may be that the answer is different every time. And the topic I've penciled in for that day isn't necessarily something to solve in a meeting, but I wanted to get it on the table -- let's talk about before then. The University Involvement initiative was slated for having results in the 2015-2016 academic year. And, you know, best laid plans and all that. And, the modularization initiative was specifically supposed to be in phases, and so that needs to be refreshed too. AND, there might be other things we might want to add. (Fedora Hubs, maybe?) For the subproject reports, what would people like to see? I'd be kind of interested in seeing a demo of the state o xdg-app in Workstation, as I know there's talk of having a prototype ostree-based workstation with xdg-app as a F25 feature. Possibly we could have a report from FAMSCo/FOSCo as that does (or doesn't?) get back up off the ground. What else? Also note that we should have a budget session, some point after the budget actually drops. Probably will take over one of the Open Floors for that. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader

4 7

Fedora Friends BoF actually accepted at Red Hat Summit
by Remy DeCausemaker 01 Mar '16

01 Mar '16

---Snip--- Hi Remy, Please accept our apologies. Earlier today, you may have received a notification of non-acceptance for a session we did actually intend to accept. To clarify, we look forward to hosting the following session(s) at Red Hat Summit: - SB44549: Fedora Friends! Sincerely, The Red Hat Summit team ---Snip--- Add this to the pile for Good News Leap Day Monday! --RemyD. -- Remy DeCausemaker Fedora Community Lead & Council <decause(a)redhat.com> https://whatcanidoforfedora.org

4 7

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

MOVED to https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/tag/council February 2016