desktop August 2021

desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org

9 participants
21 discussions

Release criteria proposal: networking requirements
by Adam Williamson 01 Mar '22

01 Mar '22

Hi folks! So at this week's blocker review meeting, the fact that we don't have explicit networking requirements in the release criteria really started to bite us. In the past we have squeezed networking-related issues in under other criteria, but for some issues that's really difficult, notably VPN issues. So, we agreed we should draft some explicit networking criteria. This turns out to be a big area and quite hard to cover (who'd've thought!), but here is at least a first draft for us to start from. My proposal would be to add this to the Basic criteria. I have left out some wikitext stuff from the proposal for clarity; I'd add it back in on actually applying the proposed changes. It's just formatting stuff, nothing that'd change the meaning. Anyone have thoughts, complaints, alternative approaches, supplements? Thanks! === Network requirements === Each of these requirements apply to both installer and installed system environments. For any given installer environment, the 'default network configuration tools' are considered to be those the installer documents as supported ways to configure networking (e.g. for anaconda-based environments, configuration via kernel command line options, a kickstart, or interactively in anaconda itself are included). ==== Basic networking ==== It must be possible to establish both IPv4 and IPv6 network connections using DHCP and static addressing. The default network configuration tools for the console and for release-blocking desktops must work well enough to allow typical network connection configuration operations without major workarounds. Standard network functions such as address resolution and connections with common protocols such as ping, HTTP and ssh must work as expected. Footnote titled "Supported hardware": Supported network hardware is hardware for which the Fedora kernel includes drivers and, where necessary, for which a firmware package is available. If support for a commonly-used piece or type of network hardware that would usually be present is omitted, that may constitute a violation of this criterion, after consideration of the [[Blocker_Bug_FAQ|hardware-dependent- issues|normal factors for hardware-dependent issues]]. Similarly, violations of this criteria that are hardware or configuration dependent are, as usual, subject to consideration of those factors when determining whether they are release-blocking ==== VPN connections ==== Using the default network configuration tools for the console and for release-blocking desktops, it must be possible to establish a working connection to common OpenVPN, openconnect-supported and vpnc-supported VNC servers with typical configurations. Footnote title "Supported servers and configurations": As there are many different VPN server applications and configurations, blocker reviewers must use their best judgment in determining whether violations of this criterion are likely to be encountered commonly enough to block a release, and if so, at which milestone. As a general principle, the more people are likely to use affected servers and the less complicated the configuration required to hit the bug, the more likely it is to be a blocker. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net

7 10

2021-08-31 Meeting Agenda (Secretary: Michael)
by Neal Gompa 30 Aug '21

30 Aug '21

Workstation Working Group Meeting Date and Time: 2021-08-31 9:30 AM EDT 13:30 UTC Location: https://bluejeans.com/395383051/ https://www.bluejeans.com/numbers Approval of August 24 minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2021/fedora-meeting-2.20… Announcements, follow-ups, status reports Make use of malcontent in the default install? https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/186 Re-revisit Fedora Workstation minimums https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/241 Improve the user feedback for OOM situations https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/202 User directories as Btrfs subvolumes by default https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/232 Open Floor

1 0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Workstation WG
by catanzaro＠fedoraproject.org 30 Aug '21

30 Aug '21

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Workstation WG on 2021-08-31 from 09:30:00 to 10:30:00 US/Eastern At https://bluejeans.com/395383051/ The meeting will be about: Regular meeting for the Workstation Working Group Current Topics: https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting Etherpad: https://etherpad.gnome.org/p/fedora-workstation-wg More information available at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10041/

1 0

Re: f35-backgrounds ready for review
by Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 27 Aug '21

27 Aug '21

On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 12:14:10PM +0100, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 9:12 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 11:38:12AM -0400, Link Dupont wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 26 2021 at 03:12:24 PM +0000, Zbigniew > > > Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> wrote: > > > >True. But those subpackages could just be built from one source > > > >package: > > > > > > > >fedora-backgrounds/f34 => builds all subpackages in the range 21..34 > > > >fedora-backgrounds/f35 => builds all subpackages in the range 21..35 > > > > > > Assuming this range notation is a half-open interval > > > > Closed on both sides, I think. But we actually have backgrounds for > > earlier releases too, see below. > > > > > , yes, I like > > > this idea. Then each subsequent release could take the wallpapers > > > from its predecessor and create a new subpackage named with the > > > previous version. > > > > I think it'd look like this (e.g. f35 branch): > > > > ... > > %package -n beefy-miracle-backgrounds > > Summary: Backgrounds for f17 > > ... > > %package -n f21-backgrounds > > Summary: Backgrounds for f21 > > ... > > %package -n f35-backgrounds > > Summary: Backgrounds for f35 > > Provides: fedora-backgrounds # only when f35 is the latest > > > > and then for f36 this would be extended with: > > > > %package -n f36-backgrounds > > Summary: Backgrounds for f36 > > Provides: fedora-backgrounds # moved here when f36 becomes the latest > > > > > Currently, the spec file has subpackages for each desktop environment > though (e.g. f35-backgrounds-gnome, f35-backgrounds-kde, etc.) since they > have to be installed in different places for each background. How would we > handle that in this type of spec file organization? The same, just have a bunch more of subpackages. A bit messy, but still better than a review and a new package every 6 months. Zbyszek

1 0

Re: f35-backgrounds ready for review
by Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 27 Aug '21

27 Aug '21

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 02:45:18PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 26. 08. 21 14:40, Link Dupont wrote: > >Wouldn't a source package named 'fedora-backgrounds' work? Yes please! > >Each > >branch in dist-git would allow for new wallpapers each release. An > >RPM using the Fedora version as its version would result in an NVR > >that clearly identifies the wallpapers: > > > >* fedora-backgrounds/f34 => fedora-backgrounds-34-1.fc34 > >* fedora-backgrounds/f35 => fedora-backgrounds-35-1.fc35 > >* fedora-backgrounds/f35 => fedora-backgrounds-35-2.fc35 > > > >But I must be missing something; this seems like its way too simple a solution. > > Nowadays, you can install e.g. f23-backgrounds on Fedora 34. If we > do it like you said, there would always be just one option. > > $ repoquery --repo=rawhide -a | egrep -- 'f[[:digit:]]+-backgrounds' > f21-backgrounds-0:21.1.0-13.fc35.noarch ... > f34-backgrounds-xfce-0:34.0.1-2.fc35.noarch True. But those subpackages could just be built from one source package: fedora-backgrounds/f34 => builds all subpackages in the range 21..34 fedora-backgrounds/f35 => builds all subpackages in the range 21..35 ... (This would likely mean that all fedora-backgrounds* source packages would be imported into fedora-backgrounds and retired.) Zbyszek

2 2

pipewire troubles
by Matthew Miller 26 Aug '21

26 Aug '21

I'm seeing a rather large number of people with audio problems and a lot of user advice to revert to pulseaudio. Is there a place this is being tracked? Is Fedora bugzilla the best place for reports, or is upstream preferred? Concretely, I use multiple users on my laptop to keep work and personal use separate, and as of latest updates, whenever I switch between them I reliably need to do `systemctl --user restart pipewire pipewire-pulse` to get sound back. Where should I report this? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader

2 1

f35-backgrounds ready for review
by Luya Tshimbalanga 26 Aug '21

26 Aug '21

Hello team, f35-backgrounds is ready for review which is trivia to do. It is needed for the beta release along desktop-background. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997854 Thanks in advance -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer

3 4

Re: f35-backgrounds ready for review
by Link Dupont 26 Aug '21

26 Aug '21

Could those be collected into an archive somewhere? Like fedora-backgrounds-extras or something similar? This would be a significant change to the way backgrounds are packaged. On Thu, Aug 26 2021 at 02:45:18 PM +0200, Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> wrote: > On 26. 08. 21 14:40, Link Dupont wrote: >> Wouldn't a source package named 'fedora-backgrounds' work? Each >> branch in dist-git would allow for new wallpapers each release. An >> RPM using the Fedora version as its version would result in an NVR >> that clearly identifies the wallpapers: >> >> * fedora-backgrounds/f34 => fedora-backgrounds-34-1.fc34 >> * fedora-backgrounds/f35 => fedora-backgrounds-35-1.fc35 >> * fedora-backgrounds/f35 => fedora-backgrounds-35-2.fc35 >> >> But I must be missing something; this seems like its way too simple >> a solution. > > Nowadays, you can install e.g. f23-backgrounds on Fedora 34. If we do > it like you said, there would always be just one option. > > $ repoquery --repo=rawhide -a | egrep -- 'f[[:digit:]]+-backgrounds' > f21-backgrounds-0:21.1.0-13.fc35.noarch > f21-backgrounds-base-0:21.1.0-13.fc35.noarch > f21-backgrounds-extras-base-0:21.1.0-13.fc35.noarch > f21-backgrounds-extras-gnome-0:21.1.0-13.fc35.noarch > f21-backgrounds-extras-kde-0:21.1.0-13.fc35.noarch > f21-backgrounds-extras-mate-0:21.1.0-13.fc35.noarch > f21-backgrounds-extras-xfce-0:21.1.0-13.fc35.noarch > f21-backgrounds-gnome-0:21.1.0-13.fc35.noarch > f21-backgrounds-kde-0:21.1.0-13.fc35.noarch > f21-backgrounds-mate-0:21.1.0-13.fc35.noarch > f21-backgrounds-xfce-0:21.1.0-13.fc35.noarch > f22-backgrounds-0:22.1.1-11.fc35.noarch > f22-backgrounds-base-0:22.1.1-11.fc35.noarch > f22-backgrounds-extras-base-0:22.1.1-11.fc35.noarch > f22-backgrounds-extras-gnome-0:22.1.1-11.fc35.noarch > f22-backgrounds-extras-kde-0:22.1.1-11.fc35.noarch > f22-backgrounds-extras-mate-0:22.1.1-11.fc35.noarch > f22-backgrounds-extras-xfce-0:22.1.1-11.fc35.noarch > f22-backgrounds-gnome-0:22.1.1-11.fc35.noarch > f22-backgrounds-kde-0:22.1.1-11.fc35.noarch > f22-backgrounds-mate-0:22.1.1-11.fc35.noarch > f22-backgrounds-xfce-0:22.1.1-11.fc35.noarch > f23-backgrounds-0:23.1.0-12.fc35.noarch > f23-backgrounds-base-0:23.1.0-12.fc35.noarch > f23-backgrounds-extras-base-0:23.1.0-12.fc35.noarch > f23-backgrounds-extras-gnome-0:23.1.0-12.fc35.noarch > f23-backgrounds-extras-kde-0:23.1.0-12.fc35.noarch > f23-backgrounds-extras-mate-0:23.1.0-12.fc35.noarch > f23-backgrounds-extras-xfce-0:23.1.0-12.fc35.noarch > f23-backgrounds-gnome-0:23.1.0-12.fc35.noarch > f23-backgrounds-kde-0:23.1.0-12.fc35.noarch > f23-backgrounds-mate-0:23.1.0-12.fc35.noarch > f23-backgrounds-xfce-0:23.1.0-12.fc35.noarch > f24-backgrounds-0:24.1.2-11.fc35.noarch > f24-backgrounds-base-0:24.1.2-11.fc35.noarch > f24-backgrounds-extras-base-0:24.1.2-11.fc35.noarch > f24-backgrounds-extras-gnome-0:24.1.2-11.fc35.noarch > f24-backgrounds-extras-kde-0:24.1.2-11.fc35.noarch > f24-backgrounds-extras-mate-0:24.1.2-11.fc35.noarch > f24-backgrounds-extras-xfce-0:24.1.2-11.fc35.noarch > f24-backgrounds-gnome-0:24.1.2-11.fc35.noarch > f24-backgrounds-kde-0:24.1.2-11.fc35.noarch > f24-backgrounds-mate-0:24.1.2-11.fc35.noarch > f24-backgrounds-xfce-0:24.1.2-11.fc35.noarch > f25-backgrounds-0:25.1.1-12.fc35.noarch > f25-backgrounds-base-0:25.1.1-12.fc35.noarch > f25-backgrounds-extras-base-0:25.1.1-12.fc35.noarch > f25-backgrounds-extras-gnome-0:25.1.1-12.fc35.noarch > f25-backgrounds-extras-kde-0:25.1.1-12.fc35.noarch > f25-backgrounds-extras-mate-0:25.1.1-12.fc35.noarch > f25-backgrounds-extras-xfce-0:25.1.1-12.fc35.noarch > f25-backgrounds-gnome-0:25.1.1-12.fc35.noarch > f25-backgrounds-kde-0:25.1.1-12.fc35.noarch > f25-backgrounds-mate-0:25.1.1-12.fc35.noarch > f25-backgrounds-xfce-0:25.1.1-12.fc35.noarch > f26-backgrounds-0:26.2.7-10.fc35.noarch > f26-backgrounds-animated-0:26.2.7-10.fc35.noarch > f26-backgrounds-base-0:26.2.7-10.fc35.noarch > f26-backgrounds-extras-base-0:26.2.7-10.fc35.noarch > f26-backgrounds-extras-gnome-0:26.2.7-10.fc35.noarch > f26-backgrounds-extras-kde-0:26.2.7-10.fc35.noarch > f26-backgrounds-extras-mate-0:26.2.7-10.fc35.noarch > f26-backgrounds-extras-xfce-0:26.2.7-10.fc35.noarch > f26-backgrounds-gnome-0:26.2.7-10.fc35.noarch > f26-backgrounds-kde-0:26.2.7-10.fc35.noarch > f26-backgrounds-mate-0:26.2.7-10.fc35.noarch > f26-backgrounds-xfce-0:26.2.7-10.fc35.noarch > f27-backgrounds-0:27.0.1-9.fc35.noarch > f27-backgrounds-base-0:27.0.1-9.fc35.noarch > f27-backgrounds-extras-base-0:27.0.1-9.fc35.noarch > f27-backgrounds-extras-gnome-0:27.0.1-9.fc35.noarch > f27-backgrounds-extras-kde-0:27.0.1-9.fc35.noarch > f27-backgrounds-extras-mate-0:27.0.1-9.fc35.noarch > f27-backgrounds-extras-xfce-0:27.0.1-9.fc35.noarch > f27-backgrounds-gnome-0:27.0.1-9.fc35.noarch > f27-backgrounds-kde-0:27.0.1-9.fc35.noarch > f27-backgrounds-mate-0:27.0.1-9.fc35.noarch > f27-backgrounds-xfce-0:27.0.1-9.fc35.noarch > f28-backgrounds-0:28.1.5-7.fc35.noarch > f28-backgrounds-base-0:28.1.5-7.fc35.noarch > f28-backgrounds-extras-base-0:28.1.5-7.fc35.noarch > f28-backgrounds-extras-gnome-0:28.1.5-7.fc35.noarch > f28-backgrounds-extras-kde-0:28.1.5-7.fc35.noarch > f28-backgrounds-extras-mate-0:28.1.5-7.fc35.noarch > f28-backgrounds-extras-xfce-0:28.1.5-7.fc35.noarch > f28-backgrounds-gnome-0:28.1.5-7.fc35.noarch > f28-backgrounds-kde-0:28.1.5-7.fc35.noarch > f28-backgrounds-mate-0:28.1.5-7.fc35.noarch > f28-backgrounds-xfce-0:28.1.5-7.fc35.noarch > f29-backgrounds-0:29.1.3-7.fc35.noarch > f29-backgrounds-animated-0:29.1.3-7.fc35.noarch > f29-backgrounds-base-0:29.1.3-7.fc35.noarch > f29-backgrounds-extras-base-0:29.1.3-7.fc35.noarch > f29-backgrounds-extras-gnome-0:29.1.3-7.fc35.noarch > f29-backgrounds-extras-kde-0:29.1.3-7.fc35.noarch > f29-backgrounds-extras-mate-0:29.1.3-7.fc35.noarch > f29-backgrounds-extras-xfce-0:29.1.3-7.fc35.noarch > f29-backgrounds-gnome-0:29.1.3-7.fc35.noarch > f29-backgrounds-kde-0:29.1.3-7.fc35.noarch > f29-backgrounds-mate-0:29.1.3-7.fc35.noarch > f29-backgrounds-xfce-0:29.1.3-7.fc35.noarch > f30-backgrounds-0:30.1.2-6.fc35.noarch > f30-backgrounds-animated-0:30.1.2-6.fc35.noarch > f30-backgrounds-base-0:30.1.2-6.fc35.noarch > f30-backgrounds-extras-base-0:30.1.2-6.fc35.noarch > f30-backgrounds-extras-gnome-0:30.1.2-6.fc35.noarch > f30-backgrounds-extras-kde-0:30.1.2-6.fc35.noarch > f30-backgrounds-extras-mate-0:30.1.2-6.fc35.noarch > f30-backgrounds-extras-xfce-0:30.1.2-6.fc35.noarch > f30-backgrounds-gnome-0:30.1.2-6.fc35.noarch > f30-backgrounds-kde-0:30.1.2-6.fc35.noarch > f30-backgrounds-mate-0:30.1.2-6.fc35.noarch > f30-backgrounds-xfce-0:30.1.2-6.fc35.noarch > f31-backgrounds-0:31.0.4-5.fc35.noarch > f31-backgrounds-animated-0:31.0.4-5.fc35.noarch > f31-backgrounds-base-0:31.0.4-5.fc35.noarch > f31-backgrounds-extras-base-0:31.0.4-5.fc35.noarch > f31-backgrounds-extras-gnome-0:31.0.4-5.fc35.noarch > f31-backgrounds-extras-kde-0:31.0.4-5.fc35.noarch > f31-backgrounds-extras-mate-0:31.0.4-5.fc35.noarch > f31-backgrounds-extras-xfce-0:31.0.4-5.fc35.noarch > f31-backgrounds-gnome-0:31.0.4-5.fc35.noarch > f31-backgrounds-kde-0:31.0.4-5.fc35.noarch > f31-backgrounds-mate-0:31.0.4-5.fc35.noarch > f31-backgrounds-xfce-0:31.0.4-5.fc35.noarch > f32-backgrounds-0:32.2.2-4.fc35.noarch > f32-backgrounds-animated-0:32.2.2-4.fc35.noarch > f32-backgrounds-base-0:32.2.2-4.fc35.noarch > f32-backgrounds-extras-base-0:32.2.2-4.fc35.noarch > f32-backgrounds-extras-gnome-0:32.2.2-4.fc35.noarch > f32-backgrounds-extras-kde-0:32.2.2-4.fc35.noarch > f32-backgrounds-extras-mate-0:32.2.2-4.fc35.noarch > f32-backgrounds-extras-xfce-0:32.2.2-4.fc35.noarch > f32-backgrounds-gnome-0:32.2.2-4.fc35.noarch > f32-backgrounds-kde-0:32.2.2-4.fc35.noarch > f32-backgrounds-mate-0:32.2.2-4.fc35.noarch > f32-backgrounds-xfce-0:32.2.2-4.fc35.noarch > f33-backgrounds-0:33.0.8-3.fc35.noarch > f33-backgrounds-base-0:33.0.8-3.fc35.noarch > f33-backgrounds-extras-base-0:33.0.8-3.fc35.noarch > f33-backgrounds-extras-gnome-0:33.0.8-3.fc35.noarch > f33-backgrounds-extras-kde-0:33.0.8-3.fc35.noarch > f33-backgrounds-extras-mate-0:33.0.8-3.fc35.noarch > f33-backgrounds-extras-xfce-0:33.0.8-3.fc35.noarch > f33-backgrounds-gnome-0:33.0.8-3.fc35.noarch > f33-backgrounds-kde-0:33.0.8-3.fc35.noarch > f33-backgrounds-mate-0:33.0.8-3.fc35.noarch > f33-backgrounds-xfce-0:33.0.8-3.fc35.noarch > f34-backgrounds-0:34.0.1-2.fc35.noarch > f34-backgrounds-base-0:34.0.1-2.fc35.noarch > f34-backgrounds-extras-base-0:34.0.1-2.fc35.noarch > f34-backgrounds-extras-gnome-0:34.0.1-2.fc35.noarch > f34-backgrounds-extras-kde-0:34.0.1-2.fc35.noarch > f34-backgrounds-extras-mate-0:34.0.1-2.fc35.noarch > f34-backgrounds-extras-xfce-0:34.0.1-2.fc35.noarch > f34-backgrounds-gnome-0:34.0.1-2.fc35.noarch > f34-backgrounds-kde-0:34.0.1-2.fc35.noarch > f34-backgrounds-mate-0:34.0.1-2.fc35.noarch > f34-backgrounds-xfce-0:34.0.1-2.fc35.noarch > > > -- > Miro Hrončok > -- > Phone: +420777974800 > IRC: mhroncok >

1 0

Fedora Workstation WG minutes, 2021-08-24
by Chris Murphy 24 Aug '21

24 Aug '21

============================================== #fedora-meeting-2: Workstation WG (2021-08-24) ============================================== Meeting started by cmurf at 17:15:39 UTC. The full logs are available at fedora-meeting-2/2021/fedora-meeting-2.2021-08-24-17.15.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Rollcall (cmurf, 17:15:55) * present: Michael, Chris, Allan, Jens, Kalev, Matthias, Neal, Owen, Tomas (cmurf, 17:15:57) * regrets: Langdon (cmurf, 17:15:59) * present guests: Zac (cmurf, 17:16:01) * Approval of August 17 minutes https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/workstation/workstation.2021-08-18-… (cmurf, 17:16:03) * AGREED: Approved (cmurf, 17:16:05) * Announcements, follow-ups, status reports (cmurf, 17:16:07) * beta freeze about to start. GNOME 41 packages should be up to date soon (gnome-terminal excluded). Some issues with it already, such as gnome-initial-setup (cmurf, 17:16:09) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996901 (cmurf, 17:16:11) * Allan reviewing open WG tickets, pushing back milestones where F35 no longer seems possible (cmurf, 17:16:13) * Make use of malcontent in the default install? (cmurf, 17:16:15) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/186 (cmurf, 17:16:17) * ACTION: Kalev to enable malcontent in relevant places, create a freeze break request? (cmurf, 17:16:31) * Michael suggests it's pretty late to enable this. Neal notes it's already sort of enabled. WG discusses scheduling. We basically forgot to test this. (cmurf, 17:16:33) * More announcements, follow-ups, status reports (cmurf, 17:16:35) * Neal requests review of https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-settings-daemon/-/merge_requests/257 (cmurf, 17:16:37) * ACTION: Michael to review the MR and poke relevant maintainers (cmurf, 17:16:39) * Allan is planning WG organisation work. Proposes that we don't change the working group name (https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/226). He plans to port our documentation from the Fedora wiki to docs.fedoraproject.org (https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/225). (cmurf, 17:16:41) * Automatically install the OpenH264 codecs (cmurf, 17:16:43) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/84 (cmurf, 17:16:45) * ACTION: Kalev to handle systemd unit for openh264, but not anaconda. (cmurf, 17:16:57) * ACTION: Neal to create a WG ticket for removing anaconda. (cmurf, 17:17:01) * Make adobe-source-code-pro-fonts optional in @gnome (cmurf, 17:17:03) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/236 (cmurf, 17:17:05) * WG discusses fonts! (cmurf, 17:17:21) * Re-revisit Fedora Workstation minimums (cmurf, 17:17:29) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/241 (cmurf, 17:17:31) * Deferred to next week (cmurf, 17:17:33) * Open Floor (cmurf, 17:17:35) * Matthias asks Allan about monospace font size. Allan is worried that the next largest size is too large. (cmurf, 17:17:37) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/134 (cmurf, 17:17:39) * AGREED: meeting adjourned (cmurf, 17:17:41) Meeting ended at 17:18:04 UTC. Action Items ------------ * Kalev to enable malcontent in relevant places, create a freeze break request? * Michael to review the MR and poke relevant maintainers * Kalev to handle systemd unit for openh264, but not anaconda. * Neal to create a WG ticket for removing anaconda. Action Items, by person ----------------------- * Neal * Neal to create a WG ticket for removing anaconda. * **UNASSIGNED** * Kalev to enable malcontent in relevant places, create a freeze break request? * Michael to review the MR and poke relevant maintainers * Kalev to handle systemd unit for openh264, but not anaconda. People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * cmurf (58) * zodbot (7) * : (0) * Neal (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.3 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

1 1

2021-08-24 Meeting Agenda (Secretary: Langdon)
by Neal Gompa 23 Aug '21

23 Aug '21

Workstation Working Group Meeting Date and Time: 2021-08-24 9:30 AM EDT 13:30 UTC Location: https://bluejeans.com/395383051/ https://www.bluejeans.com/numbers Approval of August 17 minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/workstation/workstation.2021-08-18-… Announcements, follow-ups, status reports Automatically install the OpenH264 codecs https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/84 Make adobe-source-code-pro-fonts optional in @gnome https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/236 Re-revisit Fedora Workstation minimums https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/241 Open Floor

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

desktop August 2021