On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 03:07:19PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Is "feature parity with X11" the intended measure of readiness here? I thought there were specific X11 features that are intentionally not going to be duplicated in Wayland, which would make that a false bar to try to reach.
We've been kind of selling it as "it's ready when most people won't notice". But I think we should nail down a precise bar. (Hmmm. Mixed metaphor.)
We do have this existing feature page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefault
Yeah — and that's a really great, useful thing. I'd _really_ love if there were a "good enough!" criterion listed for each feature, agreed on formally by the WG.
[...]
"Use the desktop normally, and verify that there are no obvious instabilities, or Wayland-specific bugs or performance problems" "No Wayland-specific bugs" also doesn't appear to jibe with the desire
Maybe "No Wayland-specific bugs which would qualify as blockers on their own", or something?