On Wed, 13.04.16 08:44, Bastien Nocera (bnocera@redhat.com) wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Michael Catanzaro mcatanzaro@gnome.org wrote:
Second, my understanding is that the ABRT developers prefer to improve abrt-cli and tell people to use that rather than coredumpctl.
Any particular reason for that preference? As coredumpctl gets more and more widespread, having the same tool as other distros should make Fedora more approachable which I think is a good thing?
The upstream systemd developers I talked to weren't interested in adapting coredumpctl to be usable for use cases other than for developers.
What precisely do you need?
It doesn't claim to be usable for end-users reporting bugs, and the original developers have no interest in making changes that would allow that.
I indeed think coredumpctl should probably be something for more professional users. But I'd be curious what you are missing in coredumpctl.
Lennart