On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 18:14, Colin Walters wrote:
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 18:06 -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 22:40 +0100, Kyrre Ness Sjobak wrote:
I *think* most people would be very, very angry if you killed their ability to print...
Of course, we shouldn't need a cups daemon for client-only machines in many cases
Well, right now the CUPS server is also used to pick up IPP broadcasts. It would be nice to have an IPP notification only daemon for security reasons too though.
Regardless whether we use cupsd or a lighter replacement daemon, there should be no need to keep the user from logging in until that service is there...
Matthias