On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 00:31 +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
On 9/20/06, David Zeuthen davidz@redhat.com wrote:
Sure, I'm all for that and am hopeful to get contributors besides myself. Would have to review patches etc. on list since other projects such as OLPC depends on pilgrim. But that's no different from other open source projects.
After reading all these mails :), i'll tend to say that pilgrim's yum approach sounds great. Yum's new metaparser might play a great role as well. However, anaconda provides kickstart file feature to kadischi and this is greatly used by people in the fedora-livecd list.
Sure, I'm not saying that kadischi has to adapt itself to pilgrim's theory. But since, kadischi is only maintained for the moment by Jasper and I at a very slow rate, it would be best to consider on what
- what is Kadischi, by the Fedora Project
- which one should be a Fedora Live image Creator/Installer
- how both pilgrim and kadischi can benefit.
implementing a %packages in ks.cfg-style parser as a yum-util shouldn't be much work. Mostly just extracting the code from anaconda, I'd bet.
-sv