On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 12:29 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
"Renamed"? If so, it would be just another example why our Package Renaming Process is flawed and only adds tiresome bureaucracy for those who follow it.
Hi, I'm sorry for a confusion, it wasn't meant like real "rename of a package", I did not know internals for the change, for me it was "renamed", but as Matthias explained, it was not a package rename. Bye, Milan