Hi all,
Any idea on when FC4 will be available for download? The mention of OOo 2 being provided in it (among the other additions that were related OOo 2) make it sound great. What version of GNOME will be included. (URL can be considered a suitable answer to these questions...) Thanks!
-David Chipman
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 00:34 -0500, David C. Chipman wrote:
Hi all,
Any idea on when FC4 will be available for download? The mention of
OOo 2 being provided in it (among the other additions that were related OOo 2) make it sound great. What version of GNOME will be included. (URL can be considered a suitable answer to these questions...) Thanks!
http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/schedule/
-sv
Hi Seth,
I want to thank you for the quick response (kicks self, "BASH HEAD HERE", etc.)
-David Chipman
On Thu, 2005-10-03 at 00:46 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 00:34 -0500, David C. Chipman wrote:
Hi all,
Any idea on when FC4 will be available for download? The mention of
OOo 2 being provided in it (among the other additions that were related OOo 2) make it sound great. What version of GNOME will be included. (URL can be considered a suitable answer to these questions...) Thanks!
http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/schedule/
-sv
- As it has been hinted, we can expect OOo 2.0 to be boundled with
it, does this means Core 2 will feature a JVM with it? If so, which?
OOo 2.0 will be built by gcj, which is FOSS. For more information, search the archives.
(I'm also assuming you mean Core 4, not Core 2.)
David C. Chipman wrote:
Hi all,
Any idea on when FC4 will be available for download? The mention of
OOo 2 being provided in it (among the other additions that were related OOo 2) make it sound great. What version of GNOME will be included. (URL can be considered a suitable answer to these questions...) Thanks!
-David Chipman
I think some other interesting questions would be in order:
1) From the desktop stand point, what advancements have there been made in regards to things like udev. We all know udev in FC3 works, but sometimes fails silently and wthout any warning whatsoever to the user on what's going on. I'm sure this has been worked on for Core 4, but how has it been addressed?
2) Though I'm pretty sure it is safe to assume the latest and greatest of environments will ship with it (Xorg 6.8.2, GNOME 2.10, KDE 3.4.x), from a desktop experience stand point, what can we expect? What about eyecandy by means of extensions like Composite, RENDER, Fixes, damages, et al, will Core 4 feature a way to enable/disable these, or is this dependent on the environment used? What about multimedia capabilities? (I can alsmost forsee it will include ALSA at the very least 1.0.9, if not 1.1.0 [or 1.0.10] is made available by then)
3) As it has been hinted, we can expect OOo 2.0 to be boundled with it, does this means Core 2 will feature a JVM with it? If so, which?
Richard Li wrote:
- As it has been hinted, we can expect OOo 2.0 to be boundled with
it, does this means Core 2 will feature a JVM with it? If so, which?
OOo 2.0 will be built by gcj, which is FOSS. For more information, search the archives.
(I'm also assuming you mean Core 4, not Core 2.)
Yeah, sorry... My mistake. I meant Core 4...
Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote:
- From the desktop stand point, what advancements have there been
made in regards to things like udev. We all know udev in FC3 works, but sometimes fails silently and wthout any warning whatsoever to the user on what's going on. I'm sure this has been worked on for Core 4, but how has it been addressed?
What exactly do you mean?
Harald Hoyer wrote:
Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote:
- From the desktop stand point, what advancements have there been
made in regards to things like udev. We all know udev in FC3 works, but sometimes fails silently and wthout any warning whatsoever to the user on what's going on. I'm sure this has been worked on for Core 4, but how has it been addressed?
What exactly do you mean?
For instance when your USB mouse suddenly stops working, and if you search for your any kind of explanation in the system log, you'll most likely will find a series of erros regarding timeouts and that the device is not accepting x or y address...
Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote:
Harald Hoyer wrote:
Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote:
- From the desktop stand point, what advancements have there been
made in regards to things like udev. We all know udev in FC3 works, but sometimes fails silently and wthout any warning whatsoever to the user on what's going on. I'm sure this has been worked on for Core 4, but how has it been addressed?
What exactly do you mean?
For instance when your USB mouse suddenly stops working, and if you search for your any kind of explanation in the system log, you'll most likely will find a series of erros regarding timeouts and that the device is not accepting x or y address...
udev has nothing to do with that... that is the kernel... I also experience those mouse hangups... search bugzilla for this kernel bug.
desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org