As promised in the working group meeting last week, I went through the bugs on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=WaylandRelated%C2%A0and made an attempt to extract a shorter list of serious issues that we should treat as blockers for Wayland-by-default.
Here is the result: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=Wayland ByDefault
I'm not sure I was 100% successful, but I tried to stick to shell crashes and issues that cut across multiple apps.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Matthias Clasen mclasen@redhat.com wrote:
As promised in the working group meeting last week, I went through the bugs on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=WaylandRelated and made an attempt to extract a shorter list of serious issues that we should treat as blockers for Wayland-by-default.
Here is the result: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=Wayland ByDefault
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=WaylandByDefault
(the wrapping broke the link)
On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 14:49 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
As promised in the working group meeting last week, I went through the bugs on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=WaylandRelated%C2%A0an d made an attempt to extract a shorter list of serious issues that we should treat as blockers for Wayland-by-default.
It's a good list, though I'm not sure about the gedit and shotwell bugs -- if nobody can reproduce them anymore, they're probably not blockers.
Consider https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758958%C2%A0from GNOME Bugzilla as well.
Michael
I'd like to throw in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278159 which was the most common crasher on F24 with Gnome+wayland for me. It has some other related bugs which probably are duplicates: #1258949 #1259640 #1352715
Together with its real and potential duplicates, it has more than 300 crashers on retrace for F23/F24 alone plus ~2500 crashers for previous versions. I'll try to reproduce on F25 as soon as I can.
FYI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374321%C2%A0got accepted blocker via the normal QA process.
Michael
What about relative pointer and confinement? I believe that is pretty important to have it working.
Hi
What about relative pointer and confinement? I believe that is pretty important to have it working.
It is actually already there, with support in mutter/gnome-shell and SDL2 so if you run a native Wayland game, it would work already.
What's missing is Xwayland support, but there are patches from Jonas already available upstream, of which those which implies an ABI change are already merged in xserver-1.19, so that it can be added later without causing an ABI break.
Cheers, Olivier
Can we get those XWayland patches backported to F25?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Olivier Fourdan" ofourdan@redhat.com To: "Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop" desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 10:05:01 AM Subject: Re: Wayland-by-default blockers
Hi
What about relative pointer and confinement? I believe that is pretty important to have it working.
It is actually already there, with support in mutter/gnome-shell and SDL2 so if you run a native Wayland game, it would work already.
What's missing is Xwayland support, but there are patches from Jonas already available upstream, of which those which implies an ABI change are already merged in xserver-1.19, so that it can be added later without causing an ABI break.
Cheers, Olivier _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org