Hi guys,
Should gtkhtml be included in the copr? I don't see it there at the moment: http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/rhughes/f20-gnome-3-14/fedora...
The Fedora 20 version is 4.6.6-2 while rawhide/F21 is tracking 4.8.2 now[1]. Apparently there are bugs in gtkhtml that affect evolution. For example, this is one that I ran into with gnome 3.13:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732499
[1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/gtkhtml3/builds/
On 1 July 2014 11:28, Ankur Sinha sanjay.ankur@gmail.com wrote:
Should gtkhtml be included in the copr? I don't see it there at the moment:
Does evolution still depend on gtkhtml? I thought it had ported to webkit completely now?
Richard.
On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 11:34 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
Does evolution still depend on gtkhtml? I thought it had ported to webkit completely now?
Evolution 3.12 still uses gtkhtml for its email composer.
Evolution 3.13 finally dumped gtkhtml completely, but that version is targeted for Fedora 22.
Development-wise, gtkhtml is dead. But recent versions do have some important patches to keep up with gtk3 changes.
On 1 July 2014 11:53, Matthew Barnes mbarnes@redhat.com wrote:
Evolution 3.13 finally dumped gtkhtml completely, but that version is targeted for Fedora 22.
Ahh, I forgot the skipped release cycle; my apologies.
Development-wise, gtkhtml is dead. But recent versions do have some important patches to keep up with gtk3 changes.
Building in the copr now. Thanks.
Richard.
On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 11:34 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 1 July 2014 11:28, Ankur Sinha sanjay.ankur@gmail.com wrote:
Should gtkhtml be included in the copr? I don't see it there at the moment:
Does evolution still depend on gtkhtml? I thought it had ported to webkit completely now?
Nope, it still depends on it, the webkit composer branch is now in master (towards the 2.16 release as Evo has switched now to yearly release cycles). So yeah, gtkhtml needs to stay for F21.
Richard.
desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org