I have been accused of 'solo action' recently, so I'll announce the change I want to make to the desktop spin here.
If there are good reasons why the desktop spin should be a nfs or nis client, speak up; otherwise I'll commit this:
diff --git a/fedora-livecd-desktop.ks b/fedora-livecd-desktop.ks index 52c1d0a..4dcf011 100644 --- a/fedora-livecd-desktop.ks +++ b/fedora-livecd-desktop.ks @@ -67,6 +67,10 @@ festvox-slt-arctic-hts -rsh -telnet -unix2dos +-nfs-utils +-ypbind +-yp-tools +-rpcbind
# drop some system-config things -system-config-boot
Matthias
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Matthias Clasen mclasen@redhat.com wrote:
I have been accused of 'solo action' recently, so I'll announce the change I want to make to the desktop spin here.
If there are good reasons why the desktop spin should be a nfs or nis client, speak up; otherwise I'll commit this:
<predictable response> These changes should be made in the @gnome-desktop comps group.
Colin Walters (walters@verbum.org) said:
I have been accused of 'solo action' recently, so I'll announce the change I want to make to the desktop spin here.
If there are good reasons why the desktop spin should be a nfs or nis client, speak up; otherwise I'll commit this:
<predictable response> These changes should be made in the @gnome-desktop comps group.
Those packages aren't part of the desktop group; they're part of the base group.
Bill
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Bill Nottingham notting@redhat.com wrote:
Colin Walters (walters@verbum.org) said:
I have been accused of 'solo action' recently, so I'll announce the change I want to make to the desktop spin here.
If there are good reasons why the desktop spin should be a nfs or nis client, speak up; otherwise I'll commit this:
<predictable response> These changes should be made in the @gnome-desktop comps group.
Those packages aren't part of the desktop group; they're part of the base group.
We should move all of the "traditional Unix" bits out that aren't actually hard required (talk, rsh, rsync, man-pages) into a separate group, or alternatively switch desktop to somehow depend on @base[required].
Colin Walters (walters@verbum.org) said:
Those packages aren't part of the desktop group; they're part of the base group.
We should move all of the "traditional Unix" bits out that aren't actually hard required (talk, rsh, rsync, man-pages) into a separate group, or alternatively switch desktop to somehow depend on @base[required].
Well, we could have a comps file that defines groups like...
core base debugging legacy-unix nfs-file-server mysql network-file-system-client console-internet directory-client print-client x11 general-desktop ... etc.
But that's a fairly large shift in design.
Bill
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Bill Nottingham notting@redhat.com wrote:
Colin Walters (walters@verbum.org) said:
Those packages aren't part of the desktop group; they're part of the base group.
We should move all of the "traditional Unix" bits out that aren't
actually
hard required (talk, rsh, rsync, man-pages) into a separate group, or alternatively switch desktop to somehow depend on @base[required].
Well, we could have a comps file that defines groups like...
But that's a fairly large shift in design.
There is a question how far to go, however, I think one could not argue that the base group's description "This group includes a minimal set of packages." is not really accurate.
We could alternatively say that desktop doesn't include @base, and just rely on explicit dependencies. But that would need case by case evaluation; prelink and pm-utils are obvious things we want.
On 10/02/2009 01:29 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I have been accused of 'solo action' recently, so I'll announce the change I want to make to the desktop spin here.
If there are good reasons why the desktop spin should be a nfs or nis client, speak up; otherwise I'll commit this:
Never really got a decision on
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-desktop-list/2009-August/msg00126.htm...
Also there was some discussions about turning off the firewall. Is that happening or not?
Rahul
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Rahul Sundaram sundaram@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-desktop-list/2009-August/msg00126.htm...
I think we should wait to do this right in F13, as it looks like wwoods did good work there.
desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org