I've parsed the most recent emails as best as I could and pushed new schedules, but I know parts are still wrong. In particular:
1) What to do with Installation Guide dates and tasks 2) Description of "0-day tasks"
I don't think continuing to do this over email is going to be productive so I'm wondering when we can all meet on gobby again? Or if telephone works I'd be glad to set up an international phone conference? Or let me know when your next IRC meetings are and I can try to attend?
Those are all the options I can think of :)
Thanks, John
On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 16:09 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
I've parsed the most recent emails as best as I could and pushed new schedules, but I know parts are still wrong. In particular:
- What to do with Installation Guide dates and tasks
- Description of "0-day tasks"
I don't think continuing to do this over email is going to be productive so I'm wondering when we can all meet on gobby again? Or if telephone works I'd be glad to set up an international phone conference? Or let me know when your next IRC meetings are and I can try to attend?
Those are all the options I can think of :)
This sounds like a great idea to me. I think Gobby and IRC would work fine (even just using the chat in Gobby for that matter). The phone can be confusing with more than a couple people involved, when there's no agenda to follow. (At least, that's how I interpreted our marginal success in a phone conversation between you, me, and Karsten working on the Docs schedule.) In a brainstorming session like the ones Gobby encourages, that would be chaotic, so I vote -1 phone. But +2 for other collaboration, yee-ha!
Paul W. Frields さんは書きました:
On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 16:09 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
I've parsed the most recent emails as best as I could and pushed new schedules, but I know parts are still wrong. In particular:
- What to do with Installation Guide dates and tasks
- Description of "0-day tasks"
I don't think continuing to do this over email is going to be productive so I'm wondering when we can all meet on gobby again? Or if telephone works I'd be glad to set up an international phone conference? Or let me know when your next IRC meetings are and I can try to attend?
Those are all the options I can think of :)
This sounds like a great idea to me. I think Gobby and IRC would work fine (even just using the chat in Gobby for that matter). The phone can be confusing with more than a couple people involved, when there's no agenda to follow. (At least, that's how I interpreted our marginal success in a phone conversation between you, me, and Karsten working on the Docs schedule.) In a brainstorming session like the ones Gobby encourages, that would be chaotic, so I vote -1 phone. But +2 for other collaboration, yee-ha!
It might be too late to respond, but I am familiar with IRC, so +1 for IRC. Thank you for bringing this up.
noriko
-- Fedora-trans-list mailing list Fedora-trans-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-trans-list
It might be difficult for people who doesnt speak native-English to understand everyone and vice versa... +1 for IRC
-Magnus
2008/10/14 Noriko Mizumoto noriko@redhat.com
Paul W. Frields さんは書きました:
On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 16:09 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
I've parsed the most recent emails as best as I could and pushed new schedules, but I know parts are still wrong. In particular:
- What to do with Installation Guide dates and tasks
- Description of "0-day tasks"
I don't think continuing to do this over email is going to be productive so I'm wondering when we can all meet on gobby again? Or if telephone works I'd be glad to set up an international phone conference? Or let me know when your next IRC meetings are and I can try to attend?
Those are all the options I can think of :)
This sounds like a great idea to me. I think Gobby and IRC would work fine (even just using the chat in Gobby for that matter). The phone can be confusing with more than a couple people involved, when there's no agenda to follow. (At least, that's how I interpreted our marginal success in a phone conversation between you, me, and Karsten working on the Docs schedule.) In a brainstorming session like the ones Gobby encourages, that would be chaotic, so I vote -1 phone. But +2 for other collaboration, yee-ha!
It might be too late to respond, but I am familiar with IRC, so +1 for IRC. Thank you for bringing this up.
noriko
-- Fedora-trans-list mailing list Fedora-trans-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-trans-list
-- Fedora-trans-list mailing list Fedora-trans-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-trans-list
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 10:03 +1000, Noriko Mizumoto wrote:
It might be too late to respond, but I am familiar with IRC, so +1 for IRC. Thank you for bringing this up.
+1 to IRC.
We also need to use Gobby for shared, real-time document editing.
Where Gobby doesn't work for someone, we can do regular (~5 minute) saves to a wiki page, and take input via IRC.
Considering the folks involved ...
UTC +2 UTC +10 UTC -7
When is a good time?
- Karsten
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 12:53 -0700, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 10:03 +1000, Noriko Mizumoto wrote:
It might be too late to respond, but I am familiar with IRC, so +1 for IRC. Thank you for bringing this up.
+1 to IRC.
We also need to use Gobby for shared, real-time document editing.
Where Gobby doesn't work for someone, we can do regular (~5 minute) saves to a wiki page, and take input via IRC.
Considering the folks involved ...
UTC +2 UTC +10 UTC -7
When is a good time?
Someone's going to get shafted on the timezone, no question. I can do a night meeting but it means Central Europe is asleep. I can do a morning but then Karsten will be asleep. And in between, Brisbane is asleep! Wow, this is making me sleepy too....
Paul W. Frields さんは書きました:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 12:53 -0700, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 10:03 +1000, Noriko Mizumoto wrote:
It might be too late to respond, but I am familiar with IRC, so +1 for IRC. Thank you for bringing this up.
+1 to IRC.
We also need to use Gobby for shared, real-time document editing.
Where Gobby doesn't work for someone, we can do regular (~5 minute) saves to a wiki page, and take input via IRC.
Considering the folks involved ...
UTC +2 UTC +10 UTC -7
When is a good time?
Someone's going to get shafted on the timezone, no question. I can do a night meeting but it means Central Europe is asleep. I can do a morning but then Karsten will be asleep. And in between, Brisbane is asleep! Wow, this is making me sleepy too....
Where is India time?
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Noriko Mizumoto noriko@redhat.com wrote:
Where is India time?
UTC+0530
Paul W. Frields said the following on 10/16/2008 06:50 AM Pacific Time:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 12:53 -0700, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 10:03 +1000, Noriko Mizumoto wrote:
It might be too late to respond, but I am familiar with IRC, so +1 for IRC. Thank you for bringing this up.
+1 to IRC.
We also need to use Gobby for shared, real-time document editing.
Where Gobby doesn't work for someone, we can do regular (~5 minute) saves to a wiki page, and take input via IRC.
Considering the folks involved ...
UTC +2 UTC +10 UTC -7
When is a good time?
Someone's going to get shafted on the timezone, no question. I can do a night meeting but it means Central Europe is asleep. I can do a morning but then Karsten will be asleep. And in between, Brisbane is asleep! Wow, this is making me sleepy too....
I'd vote for UTC -7
John
John Poelstra さんは書きました:
Paul W. Frields said the following on 10/16/2008 06:50 AM Pacific Time:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 12:53 -0700, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 10:03 +1000, Noriko Mizumoto wrote:
It might be too late to respond, but I am familiar with IRC, so +1 for IRC. Thank you for bringing this up.
+1 to IRC.
We also need to use Gobby for shared, real-time document editing.
Where Gobby doesn't work for someone, we can do regular (~5 minute) saves to a wiki page, and take input via IRC.
Considering the folks involved ... UTC +2 UTC +10 UTC -7
When is a good time?
Someone's going to get shafted on the timezone, no question. I can do a night meeting but it means Central Europe is asleep. I can do a morning but then Karsten will be asleep. And in between, Brisbane is asleep! Wow, this is making me sleepy too....
I'd vote for UTC -7
I will try my best, let us know what exact time to be.
noriko
John
-- Fedora-trans-list mailing list Fedora-trans-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-trans-list
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 17:16 +1000, Noriko Mizumoto wrote:
John Poelstra さんは書きました:
Paul W. Frields said the following on 10/16/2008 06:50 AM Pacific Time:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 12:53 -0700, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 10:03 +1000, Noriko Mizumoto wrote:
It might be too late to respond, but I am familiar with IRC, so +1 for IRC. Thank you for bringing this up.
+1 to IRC.
We also need to use Gobby for shared, real-time document editing.
Where Gobby doesn't work for someone, we can do regular (~5 minute) saves to a wiki page, and take input via IRC.
Considering the folks involved ... UTC +2 UTC +10 UTC -7
When is a good time?
Someone's going to get shafted on the timezone, no question. I can do a night meeting but it means Central Europe is asleep. I can do a morning but then Karsten will be asleep. And in between, Brisbane is asleep! Wow, this is making me sleepy too....
I'd vote for UTC -7
I will try my best, let us know what exact time to be.
What's the resolution of this topic? When is the next joint scheduling meeting?
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 01:04 +0000, Paul W. Frields wrote:
What's the resolution of this topic? When is the next joint scheduling meeting?
At this point, what is there left to resolve?
Is it just the details of when the Installation Guide bits are available?
Otherwise, I've been working with both schedules for weeks and that is the only confusion I've had. What else am I missing?
Maybe we can just solve this via email?
- Karsten
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 11:27 -0700, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 01:04 +0000, Paul W. Frields wrote:
What's the resolution of this topic? When is the next joint scheduling meeting?
At this point, what is there left to resolve?
Is it just the details of when the Installation Guide bits are available?
Otherwise, I've been working with both schedules for weeks and that is the only confusion I've had. What else am I missing?
Maybe we can just solve this via email?
I was looking at the schedule the other night while trying to answer a question for John about it, and there are definitely still some confusing dates and labels there. I'm fine with doing it by email, but I think that dedicated time might resolve the problems quicker. That way John can import those changes into any prospective timelines for Fedora 11.
-
John Poelstra -
Karsten Wade -
Magnus Larsson -
Noriko Mizumoto -
Paul W. Frields -
Sankarshan (সঙ্কর্ষণ)