trans October 2008

trans@lists.fedoraproject.org

52 participants
75 discussions

system-switch-java
by Noriko Mizumoto 01 Oct '08

01 Oct '08

For update, The above module is still unable to submit via Transifex due to the ownership issue [1], waiting for Infra team action.. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/826 cheers noriko

6 7

Re: DL problem?
by Asgeir Frimannsson 01 Oct '08

01 Oct '08

---- "Noriko Mizumoto" <noriko(a)redhat.com> wrote: > Noriko Mizumoto さんは書きました: > > Noriko Mizumoto さんは書きました: > >> Hi > >> > >> I am experiencing some stat pages not working, "A problem occurred > in a > >> Python script". > >> https://translate.fedoraproject.org/module/system-config-audit > > Umm, this is working now. There still seems to be some issues with one of the DL databases. Perhaps we should just recreate the database. Any thoughs? If you experience error messages from translate.fedoraproject.org, it should work if you reload the page. cheers, asgeir

1 1

L10n and Docs fallback
by Paul W. Frields 01 Oct '08

01 Oct '08

We have several problems currently brewing with using hosted git repos of Publican-based documents with L10n's Transifex (Tx). 1. Publican uses multiple POT files instead of the single POT model. Transifex apparently does not currently handle multiple POT files well. 2. The current (obsolete but soon to be replaced) Damned Lies (DL) used in L10n doesn't respond well to multiple POT files either. 3. There may also be some issues in Tx about support for the ISO language codes used in Publican. I've asked Dimitris Glezos to give us an idea how much work is involved in fixing each of these factors. Problem #1 is a high risk, and if we can't solve it quickly we have to fall back to our original methodologies. Problem #2 is lower risk, because DL is being obsoleted anyway, and Tx will soon take over its duties. Plus there is the possibility of a low-drag workaround, which I think some folks are working on now. Problem #3 is medium-to-high risk -- again, translators need to be able to get at the content. I expect Dimitris, Asgeir, and other L10n leaders will respond to this thread with some suggestions for (1) some estimate of how big these problems really are, (2) whether they can have the higher-risk ones repaired in the next, say, 1-2 weeks. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

1 0

system-config-audit
by Noriko Mizumoto 01 Oct '08

01 Oct '08

Hi I see something strange... http://hg.fedorahosted.org/hg/system-config-audit/shortlog/86[1] https://translate.fedoraproject.org/module/system-config-audit[2] Most recent three commits[1] do not get reflected in the stat page[2]. noriko

2 2

DL problem?
by Noriko Mizumoto 30 Sep '08

30 Sep '08

Hi I am experiencing some stat pages not working, "A problem occurred in a Python script". https://translate.fedoraproject.org/module/system-config-audit Any idea? noriko

1 2

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

trans October 2008